YouTube Thumbnail Comparison

Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve

Eye-catching and expressive thumbnail imagery — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve are two Influencer Studio image models that can help you produce eye-catching, expressive YouTube thumbnail visuals from a simple text prompt. While both support text-to-image generation, they differ in how they handle photoreal detail, stylized aesthetics, and on-thumbnail typography.

This comparison focuses on thumbnail performance: attention-grabbing subjects, clean composition at small sizes, expressive faces and gestures, and the practical need for readable text overlays. We’ll also factor in credit cost per image (Flux Ultra 1.1: 16 credits, Reve: 8 credits) to help you pick the right model for your channel’s workflow.

YouTube Thumbnail — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"Close-up YouTube thumbnail-style selfie of a 20s influencer with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, wearing an oversized pastel hoodie and minimal makeup, making an exaggerated shocked expression (wide eyes, mouth slightly open) while holding an iced coffee up to the camera. Candid handheld phone-camera angle in a bright modern café by a window, bold colorful background signage, high-contrast natural daylight with punchy saturation and dynamic composition, looking directly at the lens like an Instagram story screenshot."

Feature Comparison

FeatureFlux Ultra 1.1Reve
ProviderBlack Forest LabsReve
Subcategoriestext-to-imagetext-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeNoNo
NSFW RatingStrictMedium
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:91:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Starting Price16 credits8 credits

Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths

  • Exceptional detail and realism for “wow-factor” close-ups and product-style thumbnails
  • Photorealistic lighting and textures that hold up well when cropped tightly for faces or hero objects
  • Premium-quality output that can reduce the need for heavy post-processing to look “high budget”
  • Strong performance for realistic scenes where authenticity and clarity drive clicks

Reve Strengths

  • Accurate text rendering for thumbnails that rely on bold, readable words as part of the image
  • Strong aesthetic styling for creative, illustrative, or punchy editorial looks
  • Efficient iteration at 8 credits per image—useful for A/B testing multiple thumbnail concepts
  • Good balance of style and clarity for expressive, attention-grabbing compositions

Verdict

If your YouTube thumbnails depend on premium photorealism—crisp facial detail, cinematic lighting, and realistic textures—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better fit, especially for creator portraits, dramatic reaction shots, and product-centric visuals where detail sells the story.

If your workflow emphasizes fast iteration, creative styling, and especially accurate in-image typography, Reve is a strong choice for thumbnail concepts that need readable text elements and bold art direction at a lower per-image credit cost. Many creators will use Flux Ultra 1.1 for final “hero” renders and Reve for rapid concept exploration and text-forward variants.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for youtube thumbnail.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand