Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve
Business-appropriate professional portraits — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for a LinkedIn Professional Photo comes down to believable facial detail, natural skin texture, business-appropriate styling, and clean backgrounds that look like a real studio session. Both Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve can generate polished portraits from text prompts, but they prioritize different strengths.
Flux Ultra 1.1 is positioned as a premium, ultra-detailed, photorealistic option, while Reve leans into strong aesthetics and reliable text rendering. Below is how each model tends to perform when your goal is a credible, corporate-friendly headshot rather than a stylized or artistic portrait.
LinkedIn Professional Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid front-facing phone-camera shot of a 28–35-year-old influencer with shoulder-length dark hair in a neat blowout, wearing a navy blazer over a simple white tee and tailored trousers, holding their phone slightly above eye level and smiling warmly while looking near the lens. They’re in a real coworking office lounge with a neutral wall and a desk in the background, one hand holding a coffee cup mid-gesture like a quick “before my meetings” LinkedIn story, relaxed posture and approachable vibe. Natural window light from the side, realistic skin texture, minimal makeup, clean grooming, true-to-life colors, casual-professional executive portrait feel (not editorial, not cinematic)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Photorealistic facial detail that reads as a true camera portrait (skin texture, hair detail, subtle lighting gradients)
- Studio-like lighting control for classic LinkedIn looks (softbox feel, clean catchlights, natural shadows)
- High-end finish for wardrobe materials and grooming (blazers, collars, jewelry) without looking overly stylized
- Better fit when you need premium, close-cropped headshots where small artifacts are more noticeable
Reve Strengths
- Strong overall aesthetic polish for professional portraits, especially when aiming for a modern, brand-forward look
- More cost-efficient per image, making it easier to iterate on pose, expression, and wardrobe options
- Accurate text rendering can help when generating LinkedIn-adjacent creatives (e.g., profile banners or announcement graphics) alongside headshots
- Good option for producing multiple variations quickly to find the most approachable, executive-friendly expression
Verdict
If your top priority is a highly photorealistic LinkedIn headshot with premium detail (where realism must hold up at full resolution), Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the stronger choice—at a higher per-image cost (16 credits).
If you want a professional-looking portrait with strong style and you value faster, more affordable iteration (8 credits per image)—or you also need clean text in related assets—Reve is a practical pick for building a consistent LinkedIn presence on a budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for linkedin professional photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand