Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve
Skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for Beauty & Makeup content comes down to what you need most: ultra-real skin realism for skincare-focused posts, or creative styling with reliable text for campaign-ready beauty graphics. Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve both support text-to-image workflows inside Influencer Studio, but they excel in different parts of the beauty pipeline.
Below is a practical comparison for skincare (texture, pores, glow), makeup looks (eyeliner precision, lip gradients, shimmer), and beauty content (packshots, promo creatives, on-image typography), including credit cost per image.
Beauty & Makeup — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair and dewy, flawless skin sits at a small kitchen table, wearing an oversized gray sweatshirt and minimal gold hoops, looking slightly past the phone camera while blending cream blush with a makeup sponge. Casual morning light from a nearby window plus a soft ring-light glow, with a tinted moisturizer, lip oil, and concealer neatly arranged beside an iced coffee and a messy fruit bowl for an authentic “get ready with me” vibe. Shot like a handheld phone selfie, slightly imperfect framing, natural expression and candid posture."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealistic skin rendering for skincare results (texture, pores, natural glow)
- Ultra-high detail for close-up beauty shots (lashes, brow hairs, lip texture, shimmer pigments)
- Premium-quality realism that suits editorial-style makeup looks and “real person” visuals
- Strong for product-in-use imagery where lighting and material detail matter (glass, metallic caps, glossy packaging)
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic quality for stylized beauty campaigns (color palettes, mood, art direction)
- More accurate text rendering for beauty promos (shade names, claims, headlines, limited-offer banners)
- Efficient for high-volume creative testing and variations at a lower per-image credit cost
- Well-suited to graphic-led beauty content (flat-lay concepts, poster-like layouts, social ad creatives)
Verdict
If your priority is skincare realism and high-end photoreal makeup close-ups, Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the better fit—especially when you need believable skin texture and premium detail. It costs more at 16 credits/image, but it’s geared toward standout, realism-first outputs.
If you’re producing beauty creatives with on-image copy (shade labels, promo text, campaign headlines) or need lots of variations quickly, Reve is a strong choice at 8 credits/image, balancing attractive aesthetics with more reliable text rendering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for beauty & makeup.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand