Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve
Attractive and approachable dating app photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for a dating profile photo is about balancing two things: looking your best and still looking like someone people would genuinely want to meet. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve both generate high-quality text-to-image portraits, but they shine in different ways for dating-app-ready results.
This comparison focuses on what matters most for attractive and approachable dating photography—natural skin and lighting, flattering but believable facial detail, outfit and background realism, and the ability to produce consistent “real photo” vibes without drifting into overly stylized or artificial-looking outputs.
Dating Profile Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid dating-profile style selfie of an approachable influencer (mid‑20s, shoulder‑length dark brown hair, light natural makeup) wearing a casual white tee, light denim jacket, and simple gold hoop earrings, holding a phone slightly above eye level and smiling warmly while looking near the camera. Shot outdoors at a neighborhood café patio with a latte on the table, soft golden-hour natural light, slight background blur with people walking by and street greenery. Feels like a real Hinge/Bumble photo—relaxed posture, genuine expression, unpolished iPhone-camera look."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for believable dating-app style portraits (skin texture, hair detail, natural lighting)
- Ultra-high detail that helps images feel like real camera shots rather than “generated” portraits
- Strong performance on realistic environments (cafes, parks, city streets) that read as authentic lifestyle photos
- Premium-quality output that can look closer to a professional headshot or well-shot smartphone portrait
- Great for producing crisp, high-resolution profile images that hold up when cropped
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic quality for flattering, modern dating-app visuals with a polished look
- More cost-efficient for iterating on multiple options (8 credits per image) and testing different vibes
- Accurate text rendering for scenarios that include readable details (e.g., signage, shirt graphics, event posters) in the background
- Well-suited to creative concepts (travel, hobby scenes, themed outfits) while staying visually appealing
- Good for generating a variety of styles quickly when you want options for different apps or prompts
Verdict
If your priority is a highly believable, camera-like dating profile photo—the kind that feels natural, confident, and approachable—Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the better pick thanks to its premium photorealistic detail (at 16 credits per image).
If you want more affordable experimentation with consistently attractive aesthetics—and you value reliable text rendering in scenes—Reve is a strong choice at 8 credits per image, especially for generating multiple looks and selecting the most “you” option.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for dating profile photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand