Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve
Versatile and licensable stock photo style — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve are two Influencer Studio models commonly used to produce stock-photography-style images—clean, versatile visuals suitable for broad commercial use cases like websites, ads, blogs, and product pages.
This comparison focuses on what matters for stock content: photorealism, consistency, “generic but premium” versatility, prompt control, text handling when needed, and cost efficiency when generating large batches for a licensable-looking library.
Stock Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a casual hoodie and high-waisted jeans holds a takeaway coffee and looks slightly past the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile, like an Instagram story check-in. She’s standing near a café window with simple tables behind her, one hand adjusting her tote strap in a candid moment, bright natural daylight and clean, even stock-photo lighting, realistic smartphone selfie framing."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism and micro-detail that fits premium stock photo expectations (skin texture, materials, lighting)
- Strong performance on product-style shots and lifestyle scenes where realism and clarity drive usability
- High-end “finished” look with fewer artifacts, often reducing the need for post-processing
- Great for images that must hold up at larger sizes (hero banners, landing pages, print-ready concepts)
Reve Strengths
- Cost-efficient for building a broad stock library quickly (half the credits per image vs Flux Ultra 1.1)
- Strong aesthetic polish for modern stock styles (clean compositions, trendy color palettes, creative direction)
- More reliable text rendering for stock-like use cases that include readable signage, labels, or simple typographic elements
- Good option for concept-forward or editorial-leaning stock visuals where mood and design matter
Verdict
If your priority is premium, highly photorealistic stock imagery—especially lifestyle realism, product clarity, and images that need to feel “camera-captured”—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger choice, albeit at a higher per-image cost.
If you’re producing stock content at scale and want a strong look with better text handling and lower spend per output, Reve is often the better day-to-day workhorse. Many teams use Reve for volume and iteration, then switch to Flux Ultra 1.1 for the final hero selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for stock photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand