Anime Comparison

Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve

Anime-style characters, manga aesthetic, and cel-shading — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

Choosing the right model for anime on Influencer Studio often comes down to what you value most: ultra-fine visual detail, or strong stylization with reliable text. Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve both handle text-to-image well, but they differ in how they interpret anime character design, manga aesthetics, and cel-shaded rendering.

This comparison focuses specifically on anime outputs—clean linework, flat-to-layered shading, expressive faces, and graphic elements like title cards or on-panel text—along with how credit cost impacts iteration speed.

Anime — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"Anime-style cel-shaded illustration of a 20s influencer with shoulder-length teal hair and big expressive eyes, wearing an oversized beige hoodie and black biker shorts, holding a phone at arm’s length for a casual selfie video while glancing near the camera mid-sentence. She’s in a cozy sunlit kitchen with a messy counter (oat milk, matcha tin, laptop open), morning window light casting soft shadows, slightly tilted framing like an Instagram Story “day in my life” clip. Natural lighting, candid vibe, a little motion blur in her hand as if she just tapped record."

Feature Comparison

FeatureFlux Ultra 1.1Reve
ProviderBlack Forest LabsReve
Subcategoriestext-to-imagetext-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeNoNo
NSFW RatingStrictMedium
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:91:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Starting Price16 credits8 credits

Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths

  • High-detail anime renders: excels at intricate costumes, hair strands, accessories, and complex backgrounds while keeping a premium finish
  • Strong lighting and depth control: useful for cinematic anime key art, dramatic rim lights, and polished promotional-style posters
  • Handles realism-leaning anime hybrids well: good for semi-real anime portraits and highly rendered “illustration” looks
  • Premium output consistency: often produces fewer “rough draft” artifacts, reducing the need for multiple rerolls

Reve Strengths

  • Anime-friendly stylization: strong aesthetic cohesion for manga/anime looks, including flatter color blocks and clean graphic composition
  • More reliable text rendering: better for anime posters with readable titles, labels, UI-like overlays, or manga-style sound effects
  • Fast iteration at lower cost: 8 credits per image supports more variations to refine character design and pose
  • Creative composition: tends to produce bold, design-forward results suitable for thumbnails, covers, and social promos

Verdict

If your goal is premium anime key art with maximum detail—highly rendered hair, fabric texture, layered lighting, and “poster-grade” polish—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger pick, especially when you want a refined result in fewer generations (16 credits/image).

If you’re producing anime content that benefits from readable typography, graphic layouts, or you need many iterations to dial in character design and style direction, Reve is the better value (8 credits/image) and often the more practical choice for manga-inspired compositions and text-heavy creatives.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for anime.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand