Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve
3D renders, CGI scenes, and digital art — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve are two Influencer Studio image models suited to 3D Graphics workflows—think CGI environments, product-style renders, character concepts, and stylized digital art. While both are text-to-image, they prioritize different strengths that matter in 3D: material realism, lighting coherence, geometry-like structure, and readability of on-scene text.
Flux Ultra 1.1 focuses on premium, ultra-high detail and photorealistic output, making it a strong pick for realistic CGI frames and high-end render lookbooks. Reve emphasizes aesthetic quality and accurate text rendering, which can be especially useful for stylized 3D art direction, poster-like compositions, and scenes that include signage, labels, or UI elements.
3D Graphics — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Photorealistic 3D render (Blender/Unreal Engine look) of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, minimal makeup, wearing an oversized beige hoodie and black biker shorts, holding her phone slightly above eye level for a casual front-camera selfie while looking near the lens with a relaxed half-smile. She’s in a real neighborhood café by a window, one hand on an iced latte with visible condensation, candid “waiting for my order” vibe, background softly blurred with people and menu board. Natural morning window light with gentle volumetric rays, subsurface scattering on skin, physically based materials on clothing and tabletop, slight handheld phone-camera perspective and subtle noise like a real Instagram story."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Premium, ultra-high detail that suits close-up 3D render shots (materials, micro-textures, reflections)
- Stronger photorealistic CGI look for product renders, architectural visualization, and cinematic lighting
- Often better at selling physically plausible surfaces (metal, glass, skin-like shaders) and shadow depth
- Good choice when you need a “final-frame” feel with minimal post-processing
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic direction for stylized 3D scenes, concept art, and creative CGI compositions
- More reliable text rendering for in-scene typography (signage, packaging, posters, labels)
- Efficient cost per image (8 credits) for iterating on 3D art direction and scene variations
- Great for mood-first outputs where color, composition, and graphic clarity matter most
Verdict
If your 3D Graphics goal is maximum realism—high-detail materials, convincing lighting, and premium “rendered” fidelity—Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the better fit, albeit at 16 credits per image. It’s well-suited to hero frames, product-style CGI, and photoreal scene studies where surface detail and realism are the priority.
If you’re producing stylized CGI or digital art where typography must be readable (signs, labels, title cards) and you want more iterations for the same budget, Reve is a strong option at 8 credits per image. Many creators use Reve to explore art direction quickly, then switch to Flux Ultra 1.1 for the most photoreal final selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for 3d graphics.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand