Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve
Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For photorealistic work—images that could pass as real camera captures—small differences in skin texture, lighting physics, depth of field, and material response matter. Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve both generate compelling visuals in Influencer Studio, but they prioritize different strengths when you push for hyperrealism.
This comparison focuses specifically on photorealistic performance: lifelike faces and hands, natural lighting, believable environments, accurate product materials, and how consistently each model produces “shot-on-camera” results relative to its per-image credit cost.
Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Hyperrealistic DSLR-quality photo of a 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair and minimal makeup, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black biker shorts, holding her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie while looking near the camera with a small, relaxed smile. She’s in a bright kitchen making iced coffee (glass cup, condensation, oat milk carton on the counter), messy lived-in details like a dish towel and a couple of mail envelopes in the background. Natural morning window light with realistic shadows and skin texture (tiny freckles, a bit of under-eye softness), candid Instagram Story vibe—unposed, approachable, not editorial."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail (skin texture, fabric weave, pores, subtle reflections) that helps images read as true photographs
- Stronger realism in complex lighting setups (mixed light sources, rim light, indoor tungsten/daylight balance, realistic shadows)
- More convincing material rendering for products (metal, glass, leather, glossy plastics) with fewer “CG” cues
- Better consistency for high-end commercial looks (editorial portraits, product hero shots, lifestyle ads) where realism is the priority
- Premium output quality that holds up well under cropping and close inspection
Reve Strengths
- Solid photorealistic potential with a pleasing aesthetic, especially for lifestyle scenes and stylized-real compositions
- More reliable text rendering within images (labels, signage, packaging copy) for photorealistic product mockups and storefront scenes
- Good creative direction adherence when you want realism plus design-forward mood (color palettes, composition, artful lighting)
- Better value per image for iterative workflows (8 credits) when exploring concepts before final photoreal selections
- Useful balance for campaigns that require both visuals and readable on-image typography
Verdict
If your primary goal is hyperrealism that’s difficult to distinguish from a photograph, Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger pick. Its advantage shows most in close-up portraits, high-detail product shots, and scenes where lighting and materials must look physically believable—though it costs more per image (16 credits).
Reve is a smart choice when photorealism is important but you also need clean, accurate text in-frame and want to iterate at a lower cost (8 credits). For many brand and creative use cases—especially packaging, signage, and concept exploration—Reve can deliver excellent results with better credit efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand