Wedding Photography Comparison

Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve

Bridal, ceremony, and romantic couple shots — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

Choosing the right image model for wedding photography comes down to what you value most: ultra-realistic detail for bridal portraits, consistent elegance across ceremony scenes, or a stylized aesthetic for romantic couple shots and creative wedding content.

Below is a practical comparison of Flux Ultra 1.1 (premium, photorealistic detail at 16 credits/image) and Reve (aesthetic strength and reliable text rendering at 8 credits/image)—with wedding-specific considerations like skin tones, fabric texture, floral realism, venue lighting, and invitation-style typography.

Wedding Photography — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"A candid smartphone photo of a bride-to-be influencer (mid-20s, long wavy brown hair) in an oversized cream sweater and satin slip skirt, holding a takeaway coffee and looking just past the camera with a shy smile, as her fiancé (late-20s, short dark hair) gently adjusts her simple veil. Shot in a quiet city park near a small garden gazebo with soft warm golden-hour light, dreamy bokeh from twinkle lights in the background, authentic “IG story” vibe like a quick behind-the-scenes moment before the ceremony. Natural lighting, slightly imperfect framing, subtle motion blur like a real handheld phone capture."

Feature Comparison

FeatureFlux Ultra 1.1Reve
ProviderBlack Forest LabsReve
Subcategoriestext-to-imagetext-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeNoNo
NSFW RatingStrictMedium
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:91:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Starting Price16 credits8 credits

Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths

  • Exceptional photorealism for bridal portraits (skin texture, natural facial detail, lifelike hair and makeup)
  • High-fidelity rendering of wedding attire and materials (lace, tulle, satin, beading, veil transparency)
  • Strong performance in complex ceremony lighting (golden hour, indoor ambient light, candlelit receptions)
  • Premium “camera-like” detail for wide venue shots and multi-subject compositions (aisle walks, group moments)

Reve Strengths

  • Strong aesthetic styling for romantic couple shots (soft, editorial, dreamy looks that feel intentionally art-directed)
  • Accurate text rendering for wedding use cases (save-the-dates, signage mockups, menu cards, monograms)
  • Cost-efficient iteration for mood boards and concept exploration (8 credits/image enables more variations)
  • Creative flexibility for themed weddings and stylized scenes (color palettes, seasonal looks, cinematic framing)

Verdict

Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better pick when your priority is premium, photorealistic wedding imagery—especially close-up bridal portraits, detailed dress and veil textures, and ceremony scenes where realism and fine detail matter most. It’s the higher-cost option, but it’s built for “final image” quality.

Reve is the smarter choice when you want a strong aesthetic with efficient iteration—ideal for romantic, stylized couple shots and wedding creative that includes readable typography (invitations, signage, overlays). At half the credit cost per image, it’s also well-suited for generating multiple concepts quickly before selecting a final direction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for wedding photography.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand