Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Reve
Corporate and professional headshot photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for professional headshots comes down to realism, consistency, and subtle control: natural skin texture, believable lighting, clean backgrounds, and wardrobe that reads as truly corporate (not costume-like). On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Reve both generate strong portrait results, but they prioritize different strengths.
This comparison focuses on corporate and professional headshot photography: LinkedIn-ready framing, studio-style lighting, neutral backdrops, accurate business attire, and minimal artifacts. We’ll also weigh practical factors like prompt reliability and cost per image.
Professional Headshot — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A casual smartphone front-camera headshot of a 25–35-year-old influencer with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, minimal makeup, wearing a smart-casual blazer over a plain white tee, looking slightly off-center toward the lens with a relaxed, confident half-smile. Shot in a real café corner against a clean light-grey wall (simple, uncluttered background), natural window light from the side, subtle everyday imperfections like a stray hair and a coffee cup at the bottom edge of frame. Framing is LinkedIn-style head-and-shoulders, candid Instagram-story vibe, realistic skin texture, no editorial retouching."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for headshots: convincing skin texture, hair detail, and natural facial features
- High-detail output that holds up well for close crops (face/shoulders) and high-resolution profile uses
- Stronger studio-look lighting and depth cues (catchlights, shadow roll-off) for a polished corporate feel
- Premium-quality results that often require fewer retries to look “camera-real”
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic consistency for clean, modern headshot looks (pleasant color, balanced contrast)
- More reliable text rendering when headshots need readable elements (e.g., subtle name badge, signage, background text in office scenes)
- Cost-efficient for teams and iteration-heavy workflows (half the credits per image vs Flux Ultra 1.1)
- Great for creative-yet-professional branding headshots where stylization is acceptable (agency, creator, startup vibes)
Verdict
Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better pick when your priority is a truly photographic corporate headshot—the kind that looks like it came from a studio session, with realistic skin detail, crisp features, and natural lighting. If you need executive-style portraits or highly credible LinkedIn imagery, its premium realism is a clear advantage.
Reve is a strong alternative for budget-conscious headshot production and fast iteration, especially when you want a polished aesthetic and may need readable text elements in the scene. For many professional profiles, it can deliver excellent results at a lower per-image cost—just expect Flux Ultra 1.1 to win more often on pure realism and micro-detail.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Reve, and all our other AI models for professional headshot.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand