Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Eye-catching and expressive thumbnail imagery — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
YouTube thumbnails live or die on instant clarity: a readable subject, strong emotion, and a composition that pops at small sizes. Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine are both built for high-quality image generation inside Influencer Studio, but they shine in different thumbnail workflows.
Flux Ultra 1.1 leans into premium photorealism and ultra-fine detail—great for crisp faces, product shots, and polished “studio” looks. Grok Imagine focuses on flexible creativity and offers both text-to-image and image-to-image, making it a strong choice for iterating on concepts, remixing a base frame, and exploring bolder thumbnail compositions at a lower per-image cost.
YouTube Thumbnail — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Close-up YouTube thumbnail-style selfie of a 20s woman with long dark hair in a messy bun, wearing an oversized pastel hoodie and tiny gold hoops, making an exaggerated shocked “OMG” face with wide eyes while holding up a trendy iced matcha toward the camera. She’s sitting at a bright, colorful café table with bold wall art behind her, looking directly at the phone camera as if filming an Instagram story; dynamic tilted framing, high contrast, punchy saturated colors, natural window light. Candid, everyday vibe like a TikTok “trying this for the first time” moment, slightly imperfect handheld phone photo."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealistic detail for faces, skin texture, hair, and product surfaces—ideal for close-up thumbnail portraits
- Premium “finished” look that often needs fewer re-renders to reach a polished, high-end aesthetic
- Strong subject clarity and sharpness that holds up after cropping and adding large thumbnail text
- Great for realistic lighting setups (studio key light, rim light) that make subjects stand out from backgrounds
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Image-to-image support for fast thumbnail iteration (pose tweaks, outfit changes, background swaps) while keeping a consistent base
- Creative compositions that can push more exaggerated, attention-grabbing layouts and concepts
- High-detail output suitable for photorealistic thumbnails, with strong value at 4 credits per image
- Efficient for A/B testing multiple thumbnail directions (different emotions, props, backgrounds) within the same budget
Verdict
If your thumbnail strategy depends on ultra-polished realism—clean close-ups, premium product visuals, or “cinematic studio” portraits—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better pick when you want maximum fidelity and a highly finished look per render (16 credits/image).
If you iterate heavily, rely on remixing a base image, or want to explore more concepts per budget, Grok Imagine is the more flexible thumbnail workhorse. Its image-to-image capability plus lower cost (4 credits/image) makes it especially effective for rapid experimentation and A/B testing while still delivering strong photorealistic quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for youtube thumbnail.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand