Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Top-down arranged compositions and aesthetic product flat lays — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flat lay content lives or dies on the details: believable top-down perspective, clean spacing, consistent shadows, and materials that read correctly (paper, fabric, glass, food, cosmetics, and tech). In Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine both target photorealistic results—but they approach flat lays with different strengths.
Below is a focused comparison for top-down arranged compositions: how each model handles object placement, styling cohesion, micro-textures, and iteration speed—plus how pricing (16 credits vs 4 credits per image) affects real-world flat lay workflows.
Flat Lay — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Top-down flat lay overhead shot on a sunlit kitchen counter: a 20s woman with wavy dark-brown hair and a cozy oversized hoodie leans into frame from the top edge, looking up toward the phone camera with a relaxed, candid expression, one hand holding an iced coffee. Neatly arranged around her are a skincare serum, lip balm, keys, a small notebook with scribbles, and a half-eaten croissant on a plate, balanced like an Instagram stories “morning routine” layout. Soft natural window light, subtle shadows, casual real-life vibe, smartphone photo feel."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for flat lays (textures, fibers, embossed packaging, condensation, and fine specular highlights)
- Strong photorealistic material rendering—useful for premium product flat lays where surfaces must look “real” under studio lighting
- Crisp top-down clarity that holds up when cropping for social formats (1:1, 4:5, 9:16) without losing definition
- Best fit for hero images and final selects where realism and polish matter more than iteration cost
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Budget-friendly for flat lay iteration (4 credits/image) when exploring multiple layouts, prop sets, and color stories
- Image-to-image support for refining an existing flat lay concept—helpful for staying on-brand while adjusting styling
- Strong creative composition options for themed flat lays (seasonal drops, editorial spreads, lifestyle desk setups)
- Good high-detail output for most social use cases, especially when you need volume and variation
Verdict
For flat lay “hero” visuals—where premium realism, material accuracy, and fine texture are non-negotiable—Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the better pick, even at 16 credits per image. It’s well-suited to polished product arrangements, luxury aesthetics, and close-crop deliverables.
If your flat lay workflow depends on rapid exploration (many prop combinations, multiple backgrounds, seasonal variants) or you want to iterate from a reference layout, Grok Imagine offers a strong balance of photorealistic quality and creative flexibility at a much lower per-image cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for flat lay.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand