Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Advertising campaigns and lifestyle branding — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model can make or break a brand campaign—especially when you need consistent lifestyle visuals, product-forward compositions, and ad-ready realism across multiple concepts.
This comparison looks at Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine through an advertising lens: photoreal quality, creative flexibility, iteration speed, and how far your credits go when producing campaign variations.
Brand Campaign — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a relaxed white tee, light-wash jeans, and clean sneakers holds a sleek stainless reusable water bottle while walking through a sunny city park path, glancing near the phone camera mid-step like a casual TikTok thumbnail. Shot handheld on a smartphone at chest height with natural late-afternoon light, but with commercial-grade brand campaign polish—crisp detail, consistent warm color grade, subtly boosted contrast, and clean background separation. The vibe is aspirational-but-real: candid smile, a few loose strands of hair, minimal makeup, everyday authenticity with premium lighting and clarity."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism and ultra-high detail for premium, ad-ready hero visuals
- Strong performance for close-up product moments (materials, textures, packaging, surfaces)
- Polished lighting and finish that suits luxury, beauty, fashion, and premium lifestyle campaigns
- Great choice when a single standout image quality matters more than rapid iteration
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Lower cost per image (4 credits) enables faster exploration of campaign directions and variations
- Supports image-to-image for refining existing concepts, layouts, or brand-aligned references
- Strong creative compositions for lifestyle storytelling, seasonal themes, and bold art direction
- Efficient for producing multiple ad sizes, backgrounds, and concept sets within a budget
Verdict
Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better pick for brand campaigns that demand premium photoreal hero shots—where micro-detail, finish, and “high-end” realism are the priority and fewer images are needed.
Grok Imagine is the stronger all-around option for campaign production workflows: it’s cost-efficient for generating many concepts quickly, and image-to-image helps maintain continuity when iterating on a chosen direction. For most advertising teams balancing volume, variation, and budget, Grok Imagine offers excellent value—while Flux Ultra 1.1 shines for top-tier final selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for brand campaign.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand