Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi Comparison

Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine

Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

Cyberpunk and sci-fi visuals live or die on fine detail: neon reflections on wet asphalt, dense signage, layered street grime, and believable futuristic materials. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine both target high-detail, photoreal outputs—but they differ in how they handle complexity, experimentation, and budget.

This comparison focuses on neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetics, including how each model performs with intricate environments, dramatic lighting, and cinematic composition—plus what you get per credit when generating multiple variations.

Which Model Should You Choose?

Short answer: Flux Ultra 1.1 is better for premium photoreal detail, while Grok Imagine is better for photoreal lifestyle on a budget. If you are creating cyberpunk & sci-fi, start with Grok Imagine because it costs fewer credits per output and lets you test more directions, then switch to Flux Ultra 1.1 for polished, higher-resolution final assets.

If you need…ChooseWhy
Lower-cost exploration and more variants per creditGrok ImagineGrok Imagine costs 12 credits to start, so you can test more directions for less.
Polished, ready-to-ship final assetsFlux Ultra 1.1Flux Ultra 1.1 produces stronger final-asset polish for campaign-ready output.
Readable text in designs, overlays, and packagingEither modelEither model renders labels and typography more cleanly.
Editing and reference-driven iterationGrok ImagineGrok Imagine is more flexible for editing from references or existing outputs.
Consistent characters and repeated campaign visualsFlux Ultra 1.1Flux Ultra 1.1 holds character and style consistency better across outputs.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi specificallyFlux Ultra 1.1Flux Ultra 1.1 scores higher on realism, which matters most for cyberpunk & sci-fi.

How They Compare, Criterion by Criterion

CriteriaFlux Ultra 1.1Grok ImagineWinner
Realism●●●●●●●●●○Flux Ultra 1.1
Text accuracy●●○○○●●○○○Tie
Editing flexibility●●○○○●●●○○Grok Imagine
Cost efficiency●●●○○●●●●○Grok Imagine
Final polish●●●●●●●●●○Flux Ultra 1.1
Consistency●●●●○●●●○○Flux Ultra 1.1
Best first test●●●○○●●●●○Grok Imagine

How We Compare These Models

Models compared

Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine

Use case

Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi

Flux Ultra 1.1 — best for

premium photoreal detail

Grok Imagine — best for

photoreal lifestyle on a budget

Flux Ultra 1.1 — avoid if

You need editing, text accuracy, or low-cost iteration

Grok Imagine — avoid if

You need accurate rendered text or 4K output

Credits per image (Flux Ultra 1.1)

16 credits

Credits per image (Grok Imagine)

12 credits

Last updated

June 8, 2026

What the Examples Show

Realism

Flux Ultra 1.1 tends to produce more natural skin texture, lighting, and detail in these outputs.

Text accuracy

Rendered text comes through cleanly on both sides.

Commercial usability

Flux Ultra 1.1 is closer to a ready-to-use image asset; Grok Imagine is better for concepting.

Recommended next step

Use Grok Imagine for first-pass variants, then Flux Ultra 1.1 for final polish.

Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"A 20s Asian woman with a short black bob and subtle eyeliner wears an oversized hoodie, biker shorts, and chunky sneakers, holding her phone at arm’s length for a rainy street selfie while glancing near the lens with a relaxed half-smile. She’s under a neon ramen shop awning on a rain-slick cyberpunk street with pink-blue-purple signage, holographic ads reflecting in puddles, and a few commuters with transparent umbrellas in the background. Natural phone-camera look with soft streetlight glow, slight motion blur from passing lights, candid “on my way home” Instagram story vibe."

Feature Comparison

FeatureFlux Ultra 1.1Grok Imagine
ProviderBlack Forest LabsxAI
Subcategoriestext-to-imagetext-to-image, image-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeNoNo
NSFW RatingStrictLow
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:91:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Starting Price16 credits12 credits

Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths

  • Exceptional micro-detail for dense neon streetscapes (signage, cables, rain speckle, surface wear) with a premium, polished finish
  • Strong photoreal material rendering for sci-fi tech (metal alloys, glass, holographic UI glow, emissive panels) and convincing reflections
  • Handles complex lighting scenarios well (neon spill, rim light, volumetric haze) for cinematic cyberpunk mood
  • Best choice when you need a “final-frame” hero image with minimal compromises in clarity and texture fidelity

Grok Imagine Strengths

  • More cost-efficient at 4 credits/image, making it easier to iterate on cyberpunk concepts, angles, and colorways
  • Creative compositions that can push stylized dystopian framing (dramatic perspectives, layered foreground elements, bold silhouettes)
  • Image-to-image support enables controlled sci-fi variations (upgrade a street photo into neon noir, remix a tech prop, maintain layout while changing style)
  • High detail output that’s well-suited for rapid moodboards, storyboard beats, and multiple scene options per campaign

Verdict

Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 when your cyberpunk or sci-fi brief demands maximum realism and density—think close-up hero shots of augmented characters, ultra-detailed neon alleys, or premium key art where tiny textures and lighting nuance matter.

Choose Grok Imagine when you need strong photoreal results with faster iteration and more experimentation per budget—especially for exploring dystopian set designs, testing multiple neon palettes, or using image-to-image to keep composition consistent while evolving the look.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand