Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Runway, editorial, and outfit-of-the-day content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Fashion photography lives or dies on fabric realism, flattering lighting, accurate proportions, and styling details that read as premium at a glance. In Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine are both strong options for runway, editorial, and outfit-of-the-day (OOTD) content—but they optimize for different priorities.
Flux Ultra 1.1 is positioned for maximum photorealism and ultra-high detail, making it a frequent pick for luxury-style editorials and close-up garment shots. Grok Imagine balances high detail with more creative composition options and adds image-to-image workflows, making it flexible for iterating on looks, poses, and backgrounds at a lower per-image cost.
Fashion Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 22–28-year-old influencer with shoulder-length wavy brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing a casual oversized gray hoodie, straight-leg blue jeans, and white sneakers, holds a phone at arm’s length for a slightly tilted selfie while glancing near the camera with a relaxed half-smile. Candid everyday moment on a sunny city sidewalk outside a corner café, one hand holding an iced coffee and a tote bag, pedestrians softly blurred in the background; natural late-afternoon light with realistic phone-camera grain and imperfect framing."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for fabrics, stitching, jewelry, and beauty close-ups—useful for premium editorial looks
- Strong photorealistic lighting and skin rendering for polished runway-style frames
- High consistency in “camera-like” output that reads as professional fashion photography
- Great for high-resolution hero images where texture and material accuracy matter most
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Image-to-image support for refining an existing outfit photo, moodboard, or pose reference into a new fashion frame
- Creative compositions that help generate more dynamic runway/editorial layouts and storytelling shots
- Fast, cost-efficient iteration (4 credits/image) for exploring multiple outfits, locations, and lighting setups
- High-detail output that performs well for OOTD content and social-first fashion posts
Verdict
If your goal is luxury-grade realism—crisp textiles, clean highlights, and editorial polish—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better fit, especially for hero images and close-ups where detail sells the look. The tradeoff is cost at 16 credits per image, so it’s best used when you need fewer, higher-impact frames.
If you want to iterate quickly on styling, angles, and backgrounds—or you rely on reference-led workflows—Grok Imagine is the more flexible and budget-friendly choice at 4 credits per image. It’s particularly strong for OOTD batches, concept exploration, and creative runway/editorial compositions where you’ll generate many options before selecting final picks.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for fashion photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand