Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Versatile and licensable stock photo style — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Stock photography needs more than “pretty” images—it needs versatile, broadly usable visuals with clean composition, believable details, and minimal artifacts that could limit licensing or commercial reuse. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine both target photorealistic output, but they differ in consistency, control, and cost per final, licensable shot.
Below is a practical comparison focused on stock-ready results: how reliably each model produces natural people and products, neutral backgrounds, copy space, consistent series, and how much iteration you may need to reach a portfolio-quality image.
Stock Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Bright, even natural window light in a cozy kitchen: a 20s–30s woman with shoulder-length curly dark hair, minimal makeup, wearing a simple white tee and light-wash jeans, holds a clear iced coffee up near her face while glancing toward the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile. Casual handheld selfie angle with slight arm extension, other hand resting on the counter beside a bowl of fruit and a laptop, giving an authentic “morning check-in” vibe. Clean stock-photo composition, realistic colors, approachable everyday moment like an Instagram story."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail and crisp photorealism that suits premium “hero” stock images (product, lifestyle, editorial-style visuals)
- High consistency in lighting, textures, and material realism—useful for clean, brand-safe stock aesthetics
- Stronger performance for close-ups (hands, fabric, food, product surfaces) where stock buyers expect realism
- Often requires fewer re-renders to reach a polished, artifact-free final image, improving “usable hit rate” despite higher credits
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Lower cost per image (4 credits) enables broad exploration and higher-volume stock sets on a budget
- Image-to-image support helps refine compositions, align to a reference look, or create cohesive series from a base frame
- Strong creative composition capabilities for conceptual stock themes (business metaphors, seasonal campaigns, abstract lifestyle)
- Fast iteration for testing variations (poses, wardrobe, props, backgrounds) to find the most marketable option
Verdict
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 when you need premium, photorealistic stock images with high detail and a higher likelihood of being immediately usable—especially for product-led visuals, tight crops, and clean commercial lifestyle shots where artifacts can be deal-breakers.
Choose Grok Imagine when you want to produce more options per budget, build larger stock libraries quickly, or rely on image-to-image workflows to art-direct and standardize a series. For many stock workflows, its lower credit cost can translate into a better cost-per-keeper—provided you’re comfortable curating and iterating more.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for stock photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand