Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Dogs, cats, animal portraits, and pet lifestyle — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Pet photography needs more than “cute”—it needs believable fur texture, accurate anatomy, expressive eyes, and natural lighting that flatters coats from glossy black cats to fluffy white dogs. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine both target photorealistic results, but they shine in different parts of the workflow.
This comparison focuses on dogs, cats, animal portraits, and pet lifestyle content (at home, outdoors, action moments, and brand-style shots). We’ll look at realism, detail, creative flexibility, and cost per image so you can pick the best model for your pet content goals.
Pet Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A casual phone-camera selfie at a sunny park: a woman in her mid‑20s with shoulder-length wavy brown hair, wearing a light hoodie and leggings, crouches at eye level next to her adorable golden retriever who’s sitting on the grass, both looking near the camera like a candid TikTok thumbnail. Warm late-afternoon natural light, sharp focus on the dog’s eyes with a soft background of trees and a picnic blanket, slightly imperfect framing like an Instagram story. Subtle motion feel (her hand mid-scratch behind the dog’s ear), authentic and unpolished pet-influencer vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for fur, whiskers, wet noses, and eye catchlights—ideal for close-up pet portraits
- Highly photorealistic rendering that suits “DSLR-style” hero images, adoption profiles, and premium brand campaigns
- Strong performance on lighting realism (golden hour, studio softbox, window light) and natural shadowing on coats
- Great for polished, premium outputs where you want fewer “AI-looking” artifacts in textures and backgrounds
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Lower cost per image (4 credits) makes it efficient for generating many pet concepts, poses, and outfit variations
- Image-to-image support helps refine an existing pet photo or iterate on a composition while keeping the core idea
- Strong creative compositions for pet lifestyle scenes (parks, cafes, seasonal setups, playful action moments)
- High-detail results that balance realism with flexibility for stylized-but-believable pet content
Verdict
If you’re producing premium pet portraits where fur fidelity, facial expression, and photorealism must hold up at close range, Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better fit—especially for hero images, print-ready assets, and high-end brand work.
If you need volume, rapid iteration, or you want to evolve an existing pet image using image-to-image while keeping costs down, Grok Imagine offers excellent value and creative range for dog-and-cat lifestyle content. Many creators use Grok Imagine for exploration and Flux Ultra 1.1 for the final “best take.”
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for pet photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand