Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Original characters, game characters, and mascots — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Designing original characters, game-ready heroes, and memorable mascots demands consistent faces, readable silhouettes, and detail that holds up across poses, outfits, and lighting. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine both deliver high-detail, photorealistic character renders—but they differ in workflow, cost, and how they handle iteration.
This comparison focuses on character design outcomes: concept exploration, refining a signature look, generating multiple variations, and producing polished “final art” images suitable for pitch decks, key art, or brand mascot previews.
Character Design — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera selfie of an original influencer character (mid‑20s, warm brown skin with a small star-shaped cheek beauty mark, big round glasses, shoulder-length teal ombré curls in a high half-ponytail) wearing an oversized cream hoodie layered over biker shorts, chunky white sneakers, and a crossbody sling bag with cute enamel pins; she’s looking slightly off-camera like she’s mid-sentence, one hand holding an iced coffee and the other holding the phone. Real-world setting: cozy neighborhood café by a window with plants and a chalkboard menu, natural morning light with soft shadows and slight handheld motion blur. Character-design emphasis: distinctive silhouette (hoodie + curls + glasses), stylized proportions (slightly oversized head/eyes, clean readable shapes), turnaround-ready stance with clear costume details and accessories."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for character features (skin, hair strands, fabric weave, armor engraving) that reads well in close-up portraits
- Premium photorealistic finish that works well for “final look” character key art and cinematic-style hero shots
- Strong material rendering for complex costumes (leather, metal, translucent fabrics) and high-contrast lighting setups
- Great for mascot close-ups where texture fidelity (fur, stitching, felt, foam) sells the character as a tangible brand asset
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Lower per-image cost (4 credits) supports rapid iteration for exploring many character concepts, outfits, and silhouettes
- Image-to-image capability enables guided refinement from a draft concept, sketch, or prior generation to improve consistency
- Strong creative composition for dynamic poses, action shots, and stylized game character scenes without losing detail
- Efficient for building variation sets (expressions, colorways, accessories) to quickly converge on a final design
Verdict
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 when you need premium, photoreal character key art with maximum detail—especially for close-ups, high-end costume materials, and “final presentation” renders where every texture matters. The tradeoff is higher cost per image (16 credits), so it’s best used after you’ve narrowed down the design direction.
Choose Grok Imagine when character design is iteration-heavy: exploring multiple concepts, refining an existing design via image-to-image, and producing many variations on a budget (4 credits per image). It’s a strong fit for concept development and production-style iteration, then you can reserve premium renders for the final selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for character design.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand