Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Urban candid and city life documentation — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Street photography lives or dies on believable moments: natural light, candid gestures, lived-in textures, and the subtle imperfections that make a city scene feel real. In Influencer Studio, both Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine can generate photorealistic urban imagery from text prompts, but they differ in how they handle fine detail, spontaneity, and iteration speed.
Below is a street-photography-focused comparison covering realism, scene complexity (crowds, signage, reflections), creative control, and value—so you can choose the right model for documenting city life, building an editorial series, or prototyping visual narratives.
Street Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s woman with shoulder-length dark wavy hair in a thrifted denim jacket over a black tee and loose cargo pants holds her phone out for a quick selfie-video, glancing near the camera with a half-smile while walking past a graffiti-covered brick wall and a corner bodega. Candid street moment with a slightly tilted frame, motion blur from footsteps, gritty sidewalk textures and scattered flyers, natural overcast daylight with soft shadows like 35mm film street photography."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for street textures (asphalt grain, fabric weave, weathered facades) that helps scenes read as truly documentary
- Strong photorealistic rendering for natural light, shadows, and reflections—useful for convincing candid city moments
- Premium-quality output that holds up well for editorial-style crops and close-in framing without falling apart
- Reliable clarity in complex urban scenes (busy sidewalks, layered storefronts, street furniture) when you need a polished final image
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Lower cost per image (4 credits) enables rapid iteration—ideal for exploring multiple street scenarios, angles, and moods
- Image-to-image support helps maintain continuity across a street series (same subject, outfit, location vibe) while varying composition
- Strong creative composition options for dynamic candid framing (motion blur suggestions, off-center subjects, leading lines)
- High-detail output that performs well for social-first street content and quick-turn storytelling
Verdict
If your priority is premium, gallery-ready street photography with maximum realism and fine-grain city detail, Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger choice—especially for hero images where textures, lighting nuance, and believable candid atmosphere matter most. The trade-off is cost at 16 credits per image, which can limit experimentation.
If you need to iterate quickly, test many prompts, or build a coherent street-photo series using image-to-image variations, Grok Imagine offers excellent value at 4 credits per image. It’s a practical pick for high-volume urban storytelling, while Flux Ultra 1.1 is best reserved for the final selects where the last 10% of photoreal polish counts.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for street photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand