Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Grok Imagine
Authentic user-generated content style — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
UGC Creator content lives or dies on believability: natural lighting, imperfect-but-real details, and “shot on a phone” vibes that still look brand-safe. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Grok Imagine both generate photorealistic images, but they approach authenticity, control, and cost differently.
Below is a practical comparison focused on UGC-style outputs—product-in-hand shots, casual lifestyle scenes, unpolished backgrounds, and creator-like framing—so you can pick the best fit for your workflow and budget.
UGC Creator — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a cozy oversized hoodie and bike shorts holds her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie video, looking near the camera with a half-smile while unboxing a small skincare package on her messy bedroom floor. Morning window light, minimal makeup, a few clothes and a water bottle in the background, raw phone-camera quality like a TikTok “first impressions” story."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 4 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for close-up UGC moments (skin texture, fabric weave, product materials) when you need premium believability
- Ultra-high detail that helps product labels, packaging finishes, and small scene elements read clearly in “phone-shot” compositions
- Consistently polished outputs that reduce the number of retries when brand accuracy and visual quality are the priority
- Great for hero UGC frames where you want authentic styling without sacrificing sharpness or premium finish
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong value for UGC iteration at 4 credits per image—ideal for testing multiple hooks, angles, and lifestyle contexts quickly
- Image-to-image support makes it easier to keep a consistent UGC look (e.g., reuse a base scene, creator framing, or product placement) across variations
- Creative composition strengths for UGC storytelling (messy countertops, candid angles, dynamic hands-in-frame moments)
- High-detail photorealistic results that work well for everyday lifestyle UGC where speed and volume matter
Verdict
If your UGC Creator goal is premium, near-campaign-grade realism—especially for tight product shots, material accuracy, and crisp details—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger pick, albeit at a higher cost (16 credits/image). It’s best used for final selects, hero frames, or when you need fewer attempts to land a brand-safe “real person shot this” look.
If you prioritize rapid experimentation, consistent variations via image-to-image, and scaling UGC concepts affordably, Grok Imagine is the practical choice (4 credits/image). It’s well-suited to high-volume content pipelines where you want to explore many authentic scenarios and keep the best performers.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for ugc creator.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand