Flux 2 vs Reve
Urban candid and city life documentation — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Street photography lives or dies on authenticity: natural light, believable motion, imperfect moments, and the visual “noise” of real cities—signage, reflections, crowds, and weather. On Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Reve both generate compelling urban candid imagery, but they approach the genre from different strengths.
Flux 2 leans into control and post-generation flexibility (including image-to-image editing and fine-tuning), while Reve emphasizes strong aesthetics and reliable text rendering for city scenes where signage and posters matter. Below is a practical comparison focused on documenting city life—commuters, street markets, night walks, and everyday urban moments.
Street Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Candid street-photo style image of a 20s woman with shoulder-length dark hair in a messy bun, wearing a thrifted oversized denim jacket, black leggings, and worn white sneakers, holding an iced coffee and glancing toward the phone camera mid-step like she’s filming an Instagram story. Set on a gritty city sidewalk outside a corner café with sticker-covered windows, steam from a street vent, and a couple pedestrians blurred in the background, documentary 35mm film feel with grain and imperfect framing. Natural overcast daylight, ambient street reflections, casual handheld phone-camera perspective like a real TikTok thumbnail."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Higher-detail street scenes with up to 4MP output for crisp storefronts, textures, and distant architecture
- Robust image-to-image editing for refining candid compositions (reframing, cleaning distractions, iterating lighting/mood)
- LoRA support for consistent “photographer” look across a series (e.g., gritty monochrome, neon-night, documentary color)
- Style transfer tools that help match cohesive street sets (zine/editorial consistency) without rewriting prompts
- Face-swap support for controlled identity continuity in recurring street-character concepts (useful for campaigns and series work)
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic polish for instantly publishable street-style visuals (balanced color, pleasing contrast, cohesive mood)
- Accurate text rendering for city life details like shop signs, posters, transit boards, and street typography
- Fast, cost-efficient generation at 8 credits per image—ideal for exploring many candid variations quickly
- Reliable prompt adherence for creative street concepts (themes, outfits, locations, time-of-day) with minimal iteration
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your street photography workflow needs control: editing an existing frame, iterating on a near-miss candid, building a consistent documentary series via LoRA, or exporting higher-resolution images for crops and print-like uses. It’s a better fit for photographers and creators who treat generations as “raw captures” to refine.
Choose Reve if you want attractive, ready-to-post city scenes with fewer iterations—especially when readable signage and typography are part of the story. For creators producing lots of urban content on a tighter credit budget, Reve is often the more efficient day-to-day option.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for street photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand