Flux 2 vs Reve
Top-down arranged compositions and aesthetic product flat lays — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flat lay content lives or dies by composition: clean top-down perspective, believable object scale, intentional spacing, and a cohesive styling story. In Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Reve both generate strong flat lays, but they prioritize different strengths—control and editability versus fast, aesthetic-first creation.
Below is a practical comparison focused on typical flat lay needs like product lineup shots, skincare routines, food spreads, stationery deskscapes, and branded bundles—plus how each model handles props, typography, and iteration cost.
Flat Lay — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Top-down flat lay overhead shot on a rumpled white duvet in a small apartment bedroom: a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair leans into the edge of the frame, looking up toward the phone camera with a relaxed, just-woke-up expression, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and bike shorts. Around her in a balanced Instagram flat lay layout: iced coffee in a glass, open paperback with a bookmark, skincare serum + moisturizer, AirPods case, claw clip, gold rings, and a slightly messy phone with a screen showing “GRWM” notes. Soft natural window light, realistic shadows, casual candid vibe like an Instagram story snapshot."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Higher-resolution output (up to 4MP) for crisp flat lay details like labels, textures, and small props
- Versatile image-to-image editing for refining layouts (spacing, prop swaps, background changes) without restarting from scratch
- LoRA support for consistent flat lay styling across a campaign (brand palette, prop language, recurring hero product)
- Style transfer tools that help match an existing flat lay aesthetic (minimal, editorial, warm lifestyle, etc.)
- Face-swap support when a flat lay includes partial lifestyle elements (e.g., hands entering frame) and you need consistency
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic quality out of the box for pleasing top-down compositions with minimal prompt tuning
- More accurate text rendering for flat lays that include packaging copy, labels, or simple headline-style typography
- Fast creative ideation for themed flat lays (seasonal drops, color stories, trend-driven prop sets)
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume iteration and A/B testing of arrangements
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your flat lays need maximum control: higher-resolution output, reliable edit workflows, and repeatable brand styling via LoRA. It’s a better fit for production pipelines where you’ll iterate on the same composition, maintain a consistent look across many SKUs, or deliver assets that need to hold up to cropping and zoom.
Choose Reve if you want attractive flat lays quickly and affordably—especially when text on packaging or simple typographic elements matter. For rapid mood-board exploration, seasonal concepts, and frequent variations, Reve’s lower credit cost can make experimentation much easier.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for flat lay.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand