Flux 2 vs Reve
Corporate and professional headshot photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for professional headshots comes down to three things: realistic skin tones, consistent facial identity, and clean, corporate-friendly styling (wardrobe, lighting, and background). Flux 2 and Reve can both generate headshot-style portraits, but they excel in different parts of the workflow.
Flux 2 is built for control and production: higher output resolution (up to 4MP), robust image-to-image editing, and support for LoRA fine-tuning and face-swap—useful when you need repeatable results across a team or multiple campaign variations. Reve is optimized for attractive, polished aesthetics at a lower per-image cost, making it appealing for quick concepting and lightweight headshot generation.
Professional Headshot — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 25–35-year-old influencer with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a smart-casual blazer over a plain crewneck tee, holding their phone at arm’s length for a quick selfie while looking just slightly off-camera with a confident, approachable half-smile. Shot like an Instagram story in a bright co-working lounge with a clean matte light-grey wall behind them (simple, uncluttered), soft natural window light mixed with subtle studio-style fill for a crisp professional headshot feel. Natural skin texture, minimal makeup, realistic phone-camera perspective, relaxed posture as if they just paused mid-work to post an update."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Higher output detail (up to 4MP) for crisp LinkedIn-ready crops and tighter facial framing
- Image-to-image editing for iterative refinements (lighting, background, wardrobe tones) without restarting from scratch
- LoRA support for consistent corporate style across many headshots (brand look, studio lighting, color palette)
- Face-swap support to help maintain identity consistency when generating multiple poses or outfits
- Versatile style transfer to align headshots with a specific studio or editorial look while staying professional
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic quality that can produce polished, flattering portrait looks quickly
- Lower per-image cost (8 credits) for rapid exploration of poses, lighting moods, and background options
- Accurate text rendering is helpful when generating headshot-adjacent assets (profile banners, name cards, simple overlays)
- Straightforward text-to-image workflow for fast first drafts and creative variations
Verdict
Pick Flux 2 when headshots need to look consistent and “real” across a team, when you’re matching a specific corporate studio style, or when you expect to do multiple rounds of edits (background cleanup, wardrobe adjustments, lighting consistency). The higher resolution and editing tools make it better suited to production headshot pipelines—even if the per-image credit cost is higher.
Pick Reve when you want attractive headshot concepts quickly and cost-effectively, especially for early-stage exploration. For strict corporate headshot requirements (repeatable identity, uniform lighting, standardized backgrounds), Reve may require more prompt iteration and selection to reach the same level of consistency that Flux 2 can achieve with editing and fine-tuning.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for professional headshot.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand