LinkedIn Professional Photo Comparison

Flux 2 vs Reve

Business-appropriate professional portraits — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

Choosing the right model for a LinkedIn Professional Photo is less about flashy effects and more about believable lighting, natural skin texture, conservative styling, and a camera-realistic corporate look. In Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Reve take different paths to get you there.

Flux 2 emphasizes controllability—high-resolution output, editing workflows, and consistency tools—while Reve focuses on strong aesthetics and prompt-following, especially when text elements are involved. Below is a practical comparison for business-appropriate headshots and profile photos.

LinkedIn Professional Photo — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"A candid smartphone front-camera shot of a 30–40-year-old professional influencer with neatly styled shoulder-length hair, wearing a navy blazer over a simple white tee and tailored trousers, giving an approachable confident smile while looking slightly off-camera as if recording a quick LinkedIn story update. They’re standing in a real office lobby with a neutral wall and subtle plants in the background, one hand holding the phone and the other adjusting their lapel mid-sentence. Natural professional lighting from a nearby window, realistic skin texture, minimal makeup, no heavy retouching—authentic UGC vibe, not editorial."

Feature Comparison

FeatureFlux 2Reve
ProviderBlack Forest LabsReve
Subcategoriestext-to-image, image-to-imagetext-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeYesNo
NSFW RatingLowMedium
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:31:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Model VariantStandard, Klein 9B—
Starting Price22 credits8 credits

Flux 2 Strengths

  • More control for LinkedIn headshots via image-to-image editing (refine expression, crop, background, and wardrobe while keeping a professional look)
  • Higher output resolution (up to 4MP) for cleaner profile images and better cropping flexibility without losing detail
  • LoRA support for consistent personal branding (repeatable lighting, lens look, and corporate style across multiple portraits)
  • Style transfer and face-swap support can help maintain identity consistency when updating attire or background (use carefully for authenticity)
  • Versatile workflow for producing multiple variations from one strong base image (useful for A/B testing profile photos)

Reve Strengths

  • Strong aesthetic quality that can produce polished, flattering corporate portraits with minimal setup
  • Accurate text rendering—useful when generating LinkedIn-adjacent assets (banner concepts, nameplate mockups), though less critical for headshots
  • Simple text-to-image flow for quick professional portrait concepts without an editing-heavy pipeline
  • Lower per-image cost (8 credits) for rapid iteration on poses, outfits, and background options

Verdict

For most LinkedIn Professional Photo workflows, Flux 2 is the better “studio-style” choice when you need reliable identity consistency, higher-resolution output, and the ability to iteratively refine a headshot into something that looks camera-real and business-appropriate. It’s especially strong if you plan to standardize a professional look across a team or personal brand.

Reve is the value pick for fast, good-looking results when you mainly need text-to-image portraits and want to explore multiple professional looks cheaply. If your priority is cost-efficient iteration and you don’t need advanced editing or consistency tooling, Reve can be an efficient option for LinkedIn-ready portraits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for linkedin professional photo.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand