Flux 2 vs Reve
Polished ad creative for social platforms — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for social media ad creative comes down to three things: how polished the output looks in-feed, how reliably it follows brand direction (style, product, and layout), and how fast you can iterate variations for testing.
Flux 2 and Reve both generate high-impact ad visuals, but they differ in workflow. Flux 2 leans into control and customization (editing, style transfer, face swap, and LoRA support) with higher-resolution output, while Reve prioritizes aesthetic punch and readable text at a lower per-image credit cost.
Social Media Ad — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s woman with long wavy dark-brown hair in a messy half-up clip, wearing an oversized oatmeal hoodie and black leggings, holds a sleek insulated water bottle with the logo facing the camera while she leans on a sunny kitchen counter, glancing near the phone lens like she’s mid-sentence in a TikTok. Candid “morning routine” vibe: one hand twisting the cap open, a bowl of fruit and laptop in the background, bright natural window light with soft shadows, handheld front-facing smartphone photo feel. Clean, aspirational but relatable UGC ad framing with the product centered and in focus."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- High-resolution output (up to 4MP) for crisp product shots, close-ups, and crop-friendly creatives across placements
- Versatile ad production workflow: text-to-image plus image-to-image editing for iterative refinements (background swaps, composition tweaks, variant generation)
- LoRA support for brand or campaign consistency—useful for keeping a recognizable look across multiple ads and refresh cycles
- Style transfer for quickly aligning creatives to seasonal themes or platform-native trends while keeping core branding intact
- Face-swap support for creator-style ads or spokesperson variations (where appropriate) without reshooting
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic quality for scroll-stopping social visuals with minimal prompting
- Accurate text rendering for headlines, on-image offers, and short CTAs—helpful for ad layouts that rely on readable copy
- Efficient for high-volume testing due to lower per-image cost (8 credits) and straightforward text-to-image workflow
- Great fit for concepting multiple creative directions quickly (mood, lighting, color, editorial styles) before narrowing down winners
Verdict
If your priority is brand-controlled, repeatable ad production—including editing existing assets, generating consistent campaign variants, and supporting a distinct brand style—Flux 2 is the stronger choice, especially when you need higher-resolution outputs and more hands-on control.
If you’re optimizing for fast iteration and cost-efficient testing with a focus on polished aesthetics and dependable text in the image, Reve is a compelling option. Many teams will use Reve for rapid concept exploration and Flux 2 for finalized, tightly branded ad sets and variations.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for social media ad.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand