Flux 2 vs Reve
Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Reve are both strong choices in Influencer Studio for photorealistic image generation—especially when your goal is hyperrealistic renders that can pass as real photos. The key differences show up in how much control you need after generation (editing, consistency, customization) versus how quickly you want attractive, clean results at a lower credit cost.
Below is a photorealism-focused comparison covering lifelike detail, facial realism, scene believability, and practical workflow factors like resolution, text handling, and per-image pricing.
Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Hyperrealistic photo of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair and light freckles, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black bike shorts, holding her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie while looking near the camera with a half-smile. She’s standing in a small sunlit kitchen next to a cluttered counter (coffee mug, toast plate, keys), mid-morning window light casting soft shadows and realistic skin texture with natural imperfections. Authentic Instagram-story vibe, handheld phone-camera feel, DSLR-level detail, true-to-life colors and accurate lighting."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Higher-detail photorealism potential with up to 4MP output for crisp textures (skin, hair, fabric, product surfaces)
- Stronger end-to-end workflow for realism thanks to image-to-image editing (iterate toward “looks like a photo” without restarting)
- LoRA support for consistent photoreal subjects, wardrobes, locations, or brand/product look across a series
- Versatile realism fixes via style transfer and targeted edits (lighting mood, lens-like contrast, color science)
- Face-swap support for maintaining identity consistency in photoreal portraits (when used carefully for natural blending)
Reve Strengths
- Excellent aesthetic polish out of the box—often producing pleasing, photo-like compositions with minimal prompting
- More reliable text rendering inside images (useful for photoreal posters, packaging mockups, signage, labels)
- Fast, cost-efficient photoreal experimentation at 8 credits per image—great for broad concept exploration
- Strong creative direction for lifestyle/editorial-style photoreal scenes where “looks good” is the priority
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 when photorealism means precision and control: higher-resolution output, iterative image editing, and the ability to lock in consistent realism across multiple images using LoRA. It’s the better fit for campaigns, product realism, and repeatable influencer-style shoots where continuity matters.
Choose Reve when you want attractive photoreal-style results quickly and cheaply—especially if your images include readable text elements. For pure cost-per-try and rapid ideation, Reve is hard to beat; for maximum realism control and consistency, Flux 2 is the stronger toolkit.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand