Flux 2 vs Reve
Attractive and approachable dating app photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for dating profile photos is about more than “looking good.” The best results balance attractiveness with approachability: natural skin texture, flattering but believable lighting, consistent facial features, and backgrounds that feel like real life (coffee shops, parks, city streets, travel moments).
Below is a focused comparison of Flux 2 and Reve for dating app photography—how well each handles realistic portraits, quick improvements from an existing photo, style control, and the practical trade-off between quality and credits per image.
Dating Profile Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid dating-profile-style selfie of an influencer woman (mid-20s to early 30s) with shoulder-length wavy brunette hair, minimal makeup, wearing a cream knit sweater and light-wash jeans, holding her phone slightly above eye level and looking near the camera with a warm, genuine smile. She’s standing on a sunny city sidewalk outside a cozy coffee shop (window reflections, a couple of pedestrians in soft blur), natural golden-hour lighting and casual “just stepped out for a latte” vibe. Shot like an Instagram story/UGC post—realistic skin texture, unposed posture, subtle background noise, no studio lighting, no editorial styling."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Best choice when you want to start from an existing photo and refine it (image-to-image editing) while keeping a natural, “still you” look
- Higher-detail output (up to 4MP) helps preserve realistic skin texture, hair detail, and crisp eyes—useful for profile crops and full-body shots
- LoRA support enables consistent “signature looks” (e.g., outdoorsy, professional, nightlife) across multiple images without drifting facial features
- Versatile editing toolkit (style transfer and face-swap support) for controlled wardrobe/background changes and consistent identity across a set
- Strong for building a cohesive multi-photo lineup (headshot + candid + activity shot) with consistent aesthetics
Reve Strengths
- Excellent aesthetic polish for text-to-image portraits that feel curated and visually appealing
- Accurate text rendering is helpful when you want subtle, readable elements in-scene (e.g., a café sign or event poster) without garbled lettering
- Fast, cost-efficient iteration at 8 credits per image—good for trying many prompts to find the most flattering vibe
- Great for creative, stylized dating-photo concepts (editorial lighting, cinematic color, fashion-forward looks) while staying attractive
- Simple workflow for generating new dating profile options when you don’t need heavy editing of an existing photo
Verdict
Pick Flux 2 if your priority is believable realism and control—especially when enhancing an existing photo, maintaining face consistency across multiple profile images, or producing higher-resolution results. It costs more per image, but the editing flexibility and 4MP output can pay off when you’re building a cohesive, authentic-looking set.
Pick Reve if you want quick, great-looking text-to-image dating photos at a lower credit cost. It’s a strong option for generating lots of attractive variations and creative concepts, though it’s less centered on deep photo editing workflows than Flux 2.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for dating profile photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand