Flux 2 vs Reve
Versatile and licensable stock photo style — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Reve are both strong choices in Influencer Studio for producing stock-photography-style images, but they excel in different parts of a typical stock workflow. If your priority is flexible iterations, consistent series, and post-generation edits that keep images commercially usable, Flux 2 brings more control and production features.
Reve focuses on polished aesthetics and reliable text rendering, which can be useful for stock-like lifestyle visuals with signage, packaging, or simple on-image wording. The best fit depends on whether you need deeper editing and repeatable variations (Flux 2) or quick, good-looking outputs at a lower per-image cost (Reve).
Stock Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Stock photography–style candid Instagram story frame of a woman in her mid-20s with shoulder-length curly dark hair, wearing a cozy oversized hoodie and leggings, holding a takeaway coffee and looking slightly past the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile. She’s standing at a bright café window counter with laptops and pastries in the background, one hand adjusting her tote strap like she just started recording a quick “morning routine” clip. Natural window light, phone-camera perspective, clean composition, even bright exposure, authentic everyday vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Higher output resolution (up to 4MP) for sharper, more crop-friendly stock assets
- Versatile image-to-image editing for refining compositions, backgrounds, and wardrobe without restarting
- LoRA support for building repeatable “house styles” or consistent subjects across a stock series
- Style transfer to align images with common stock looks (clean lifestyle, corporate, editorial, minimal product)
- Face-swap support for controlled variations (useful for creating diverse, consistent sets when used responsibly)
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic quality that can produce polished, stock-friendly visuals quickly
- Accurate text rendering for stock scenarios involving signage, labels, menus, or product mockups
- Simple text-to-image workflow suited to rapid ideation and volume generation
- Lower per-image cost (8 credits) for budget-friendly stock libraries and testing many concepts
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 when you’re producing licensable stock sets that need consistency, multiple versions, and iterative clean-up—especially if you plan to create repeatable series using LoRA, or you need editing tools to keep images compliant with common stock expectations (natural details, coherent props, and realistic scenes).
Choose Reve when speed and cost matter most and your stock concepts benefit from crisp typography or readable in-scene text. For high-volume exploration of lifestyle or creative stock themes, Reve can be a practical first pass—then you can reserve Flux 2 for the images that need more controlled refinement.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for stock photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand