Flux 2 vs Reve
Polished Instagram aesthetic with curated feed vibes — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For an Instagram Model workflow, the goal is consistent, polished visuals that feel curated—clean lighting, cohesive color palettes, and repeatable styling across posts, Stories, and campaign drops. Flux 2 and Reve both deliver strong results for feed-ready content, but they shine in different parts of the creation process.
Flux 2 is built for creators who iterate and refine: higher-resolution output, robust image-to-image editing, and LoRA support for repeatable looks. Reve is optimized for quick, aesthetically pleasing generations—especially when you need reliable text rendering for quotes, promos, or on-image headlines at a lower per-image credit cost.
Instagram Model — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 22–28-year-old Instagram influencer with long honey-blonde hair in a loose claw-clip, soft glam makeup, wearing an oversized cream hoodie and black biker shorts, holds her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie while glancing near the camera mid-sip of an iced latte. Cozy modern café setting with a window seat, messy tote bag and laptop on the table, natural morning light streaming in with a warm, soft color grade and subtle ring-light catchlights for a curated-but-real Stories vibe. Shot like a real phone camera photo with a slight hand-held tilt, candid expression and relaxed posture."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Higher detail potential with up to 4MP output for crisp, feed-ready crops and close-ups
- LoRA support to lock in a consistent “brand look” (palette, lighting, styling) across a curated grid
- Versatile image-to-image editing for refining poses, outfits, backgrounds, and composition without restarting
- Style transfer tools that help match new posts to an existing Instagram aesthetic
- Face-swap support for consistent identity-based content and campaign variations
Reve Strengths
- Strong out-of-the-box aesthetic quality for polished, trendy Instagram visuals with minimal prompting
- Accurate text rendering for posters, product callouts, quote cards, and promo graphics
- Fast creative ideation for moodboards, concept posts, and rapid feed experiments
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume content calendars and testing multiple concepts
Verdict
If your priority is a highly consistent, controllable Instagram feed—where you’ll reuse a signature look, iterate on the same hero image, or maintain identity continuity—Flux 2 is the stronger “studio” option thanks to LoRA support, editing depth, and higher-resolution output.
If you want quick, aesthetically pleasing posts and especially need clean, readable on-image text at a budget-friendly rate, Reve is the better everyday generator. Many Instagram teams will use Reve for rapid concepting and text-led creatives, then switch to Flux 2 when a post needs heavier refinement or strict brand consistency.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for instagram model.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand