Flux 2 vs Reve
Product-only shots, flat lays, and unboxing — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for product photography comes down to consistency, controllability, and output quality—especially for product-only hero shots, flat lays, and unboxing scenes. Flux 2 and Reve both generate strong visuals in Influencer Studio, but they shine in different parts of a product workflow.
Flux 2 is built for teams that need iterative refinement: image-to-image editing, style transfer, optional LoRA fine-tuning, and up to 4MP output. Reve focuses on aesthetic polish and notably accurate text rendering, which can matter for packaging, labels, and on-image callouts.
Product Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a cozy oversized hoodie and biker shorts holds a sleek matte skincare serum bottle up close to the phone camera, glancing near the lens with a casual “just tried this” expression, slightly messy bed and nightstand blurred behind her. Product-photography look: the serum is sharply in focus and centered with a clean light-gray backdrop feel created by shallow depth of field, crisp defined shadow under the bottle, dramatic studio-style key light from the side while still reading as natural window light. Shot like an Instagram Story/UGC ad on a smartphone, handheld, authentic and unpolished."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- More control for product-only iterations with image-to-image editing (refine angles, lighting, backgrounds, and props without restarting)
- Higher output detail up to 4MP for crisp packaging edges, textures (plastic, metal, fabric), and marketplace-ready crops
- LoRA support for brand consistency (repeatable look across SKUs, seasonal variants, or a unified catalog style)
- Versatile style transfer for quickly testing studio looks (clean white sweep, moody lifestyle, premium glossy, etc.)
- Face-swap support can help keep unboxing talent consistent when a human is present (where appropriate for your use case)
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic quality for premium-looking hero shots and flat lays with minimal prompt effort
- Accurate text rendering—useful for readable packaging, labels, and typography-heavy products
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume concepting, A/B testing layouts, and rapid mood-board generation
- Great for creative product scenes where visual appeal is the priority over granular edit control
Verdict
Pick Flux 2 when product photography needs tight control: consistent angles and lighting across a catalog, higher-resolution outputs, and a workflow that benefits from iterative edits and brand-specific tuning. It’s typically the better fit for teams producing repeatable product-only sets and polished e-commerce deliverables.
Pick Reve when you want attractive product imagery fast—especially if your product shots rely on readable packaging text or you need to generate lots of creative variations on a smaller credit budget. For many unboxing concepts and flat-lay ideas, Reve is an efficient first pass before committing to heavier refinement.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Reve, and all our other AI models for product photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand