Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
Urban candid and city life documentation — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Street photography lives or dies on authenticity: believable light, natural human gestures, lived-in streets, and the small imperfections that make a scene feel candid. Influencer Studio offers two distinct approaches for generating urban documentary-style images—Flux Ultra 1.1 for premium photoreal detail, and Z-Image Turbo for fast, cost-effective creation with flexible LoRA styling.
This comparison focuses on typical street-photo needs: busy sidewalks, public transit moments, storefront reflections, mixed lighting at dusk, and unobtrusive “caught-in-the-moment” compositions. We’ll look at where each model shines for city life documentation, and which one fits your workflow and budget.
Street Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length dark wavy hair in a thrifted oversized hoodie, bike shorts, and worn sneakers holds her phone out for a quick selfie video, glancing near the camera mid-sentence with a half-smile. She’s on a gritty city sidewalk outside a corner bodega with peeling posters, wet pavement, and passing pedestrians blurred behind her, documentary street-photo vibe like 35mm film grain. Natural overcast daylight, handheld phone-camera feel, imperfect framing and candid motion."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Premium photorealism that suits documentary-style city scenes (skin texture, fabric, signage, and street grit)
- Exceptional micro-detail for wide urban frames—useful when you want readable environmental context without losing realism
- More convincing lighting and reflections for street staples like storefront glass, wet pavement, and night neon
- Strong output quality for hero images, print-ready assets, and close-up candid portraits
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for iterating street-photo concepts (angles, timing, crowd density, weather) in seconds
- Lower per-image cost, making it practical for large batches, moodboards, and A/B testing variations
- Image-to-image support for refining an existing street scene composition or upgrading a rough draft
- LoRA support for consistent street aesthetics (e.g., gritty 90s film look, Tokyo neon, muted documentary palettes) across a series
Verdict
If your goal is the most believable “real camera” street photography—especially for hero shots, close candid portraits, and complex city lighting—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the premium pick. It’s better suited when authenticity and fine detail are non-negotiable, even at a higher credit cost.
If you need volume, speed, and stylistic consistency across a campaign or series—particularly when you’re exploring multiple neighborhoods, times of day, or film-like looks—Z-Image Turbo is the practical choice. Its faster generation, lower cost, and LoRA + image-to-image workflow make it ideal for rapid iteration and scalable street-photo sets.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for street photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand