Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
Buildings, facades, and architectural visualization — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux Ultra 1.1 and Z-Image Turbo both generate compelling architecture and exterior visuals in Influencer Studio, but they’re optimized for different priorities. If your goal is premium, photoreal building imagery with crisp materials and refined lighting, Flux Ultra 1.1 is positioned as the high-detail option.
Z-Image Turbo focuses on speed and efficiency, offering rapid iteration for exterior concepts, facade variations, and style experiments—plus added flexibility through image-to-image and LoRA support. Below is a practical comparison for buildings, facades, and architectural visualization workflows.
Architecture & Exterior — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A casual smartphone photo of a 20s woman with shoulder-length dark hair in a beige hoodie, black leggings, and white sneakers, holding her phone at arm’s length and glancing near the camera while walking past a striking modern glass-and-concrete building with dramatic diagonal lines and a wide plaza. Shot from a slightly low angle to emphasize the building exterior and leading lines, with warm golden-hour sunlight and a soft blue sky, candid “on my way to grab coffee” vibe like an Instagram story. Natural light, slight motion blur from walking, real street setting with subtle reflections in the glass facade."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for facade materials (brick, stone, metal panels) and crisp edge definition
- Strong photoreal exterior lighting and reflections—useful for marketing-style architectural renders
- Cleaner results at high complexity (dense streetscapes, glass curtain walls, mixed materials)
- Premium finish that reduces the need for post-processing when realism is the priority
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid exterior ideation, massing studies, and facade iteration
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) makes it practical for exploring many options quickly
- Image-to-image support helps keep composition and building form consistent across variations
- LoRA support enables repeatable architectural styles (e.g., specific modernism, regional vernacular, brand look)
Verdict
For architecture & exterior work where photorealism, material fidelity, and a premium “final render” look matter most, Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger choice—especially for close-up facade studies and high-end visualization.
If your workflow depends on speed, budget, and controlled iteration (including style consistency via LoRA or maintaining a base composition via image-to-image), Z-Image Turbo is often the better day-to-day model for generating many building options before selecting a direction.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for architecture & exterior.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand