Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
Runway, editorial, and outfit-of-the-day content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Fashion photography demands more than a good-looking image: runway shots need crisp fabric texture and accurate silhouettes, editorial frames need intentional lighting and mood, and outfit-of-the-day (OOTD) content needs consistent, repeatable styling at scale. Influencer Studio offers two strong options for these workflows: Flux Ultra 1.1 and Z-Image Turbo.
Flux Ultra 1.1 is positioned for premium, photorealistic output with ultra-high detail—ideal when you need close-up garment fidelity and polished campaign-ready frames. Z-Image Turbo focuses on speed and cost efficiency, adding image-to-image and LoRA support for rapid iteration and style matching across looks.
Fashion Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, minimal makeup, wearing a loose white tee, light-wash straight jeans, and clean sneakers, holds her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie while glancing near the camera mid-laugh. She’s standing by a sunny café window with a half-finished iced latte on the table, warm natural daylight and soft shadows, slightly imperfect framing like an Instagram story. Subtle background details (menu board blur, people passing outside) with realistic phone-camera look, mild grain and true-to-life colors."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism and micro-detail for fabrics, stitching, accessories, and skin texture
- Stronger high-fashion polish for editorial lighting, lens feel, and premium composition
- More reliable results for “hero” runway and campaign-style images where realism is critical
- Best when you need fewer iterations because each render is designed to be high quality
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for high-volume OOTD pipelines and rapid creative exploration
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for testing many outfits, poses, and backgrounds
- Image-to-image support for refining an existing look, pose, or framing without starting over
- LoRA support for locking in a specific aesthetic (brand style, era, color grading) across a series
- Great for iterative workflows: try variations quickly, then pick winners for final selects
Verdict
For runway and editorial fashion photography where garment realism, lighting nuance, and premium finish matter most, Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the better choice—especially for “final” hero images and close-ups that must hold up under scrutiny. The tradeoff is cost at 16 credits per image.
For OOTD content, lookbook exploration, and any workflow that benefits from rapid iteration, Z-Image Turbo is often the practical pick thanks to its speed, 8-credit pricing, image-to-image refinements, and LoRA-based style consistency. Many creators use Z-Image Turbo to explore and standardize a series, then switch to Flux Ultra 1.1 for the final high-impact selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for fashion photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand