Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
Business-appropriate professional portraits — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Creating a LinkedIn Professional Photo is less about flashy aesthetics and more about credibility: natural skin texture, clean lighting, realistic fabric detail, and a business-appropriate background. In Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Z-Image Turbo both generate professional portraits, but they differ in realism, consistency, speed, and cost.
Below is a practical comparison focused on common LinkedIn needs—polished headshots, neutral expressions, corporate styling, and minimal artifacts—so you can choose the right model for your workflow and budget.
LinkedIn Professional Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera selfie of a 28–35-year-old professional influencer with neatly styled shoulder-length hair, minimal natural makeup, wearing a navy blazer over a crisp white top, taken in a bright modern coworking space with a neutral wall and a desk softly blurred behind them. They’re holding the phone slightly above eye level, looking near the camera with an approachable confident smile as if filming a quick LinkedIn-style “morning update,” with natural window light and realistic indoor shadows. Clean, well-groomed executive-portrait vibe but still casual and everyday, like an Instagram story thumbnail."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Highest photorealism for LinkedIn-style headshots, with convincing skin texture and natural lighting
- Excellent detail in business attire (blazers, collars, ties) and hair, reducing “AI-smooth” or plastic-looking finishes
- More reliable background realism for office or neutral studio settings without distracting artifacts
- Stronger overall polish for final, client-ready portraits when you need premium quality (16 credits/image)
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Faster generation for rapid iteration on pose, wardrobe, and framing—useful for producing multiple options quickly
- Lower cost per image (8 credits/image) for budget-friendly batches and A/B testing different looks
- Image-to-image support to refine an existing portrait into a more LinkedIn-appropriate version (cropping, styling, background tweaks)
- LoRA support for repeatable brand styling (e.g., consistent corporate wardrobe, lighting vibe, or background across a team)
Verdict
If your priority is a premium, photorealistic LinkedIn headshot that holds up under scrutiny—natural facial features, believable fabric, and clean studio lighting—Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the better pick, even at a higher per-image cost.
If you need speed, volume, or consistent styling across many portraits (especially when refining existing images or applying a specific look repeatedly), Z-Image Turbo is a strong value choice. Many teams use Z-Image Turbo for fast exploration and consistency, then switch to Flux Ultra 1.1 for the final “hero” image.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for linkedin professional photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand