Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
Interior design, staging, and property listings — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For real estate and interiors, image quality isn’t just aesthetic—it impacts buyer confidence. Listing-ready visuals need believable lighting, accurate materials (wood, stone, fabric), and clean geometry across rooms, cabinetry, windows, and fixtures.
This comparison looks at Flux Ultra 1.1 (premium, ultra-detailed photorealism) versus Z-Image Turbo (faster, more cost-effective generation with image-to-image and LoRA support) for interior design concepts, virtual staging, and property marketing images.
Real Estate & Interiors — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Wide-angle phone photo in a beautifully staged modern condo living room (Airbnb/Zillow hero vibe): a woman in her mid-20s with shoulder-length wavy brown hair, wearing an oversized beige knit sweater and black leggings, stands near the big window holding her phone at chest height like she’s filming an IG story, glancing toward the camera with a relaxed half-smile. Clean neutral decor—cream sectional, textured rug, wood coffee table with a book and matcha latte, tall plant, minimal wall art—bright natural window light with soft shadows, candid “touring my new place” moment."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Premium photorealism suited to hero listing images (living rooms, kitchens, bathrooms) with crisp textures and refined lighting
- Exceptional detail handling for materials and finishes (marble veining, wood grain, brushed metal, tile grout) that can elevate perceived property quality
- Stronger results for close-up vignettes and luxury interiors where realism and micro-detail matter (fixtures, décor, cabinetry)
- Great for portfolio-level interior design renders and high-end marketing visuals where fewer, higher-quality images are preferred
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Faster turnaround for producing multiple listing variations (different décor styles, colorways, layouts) on tight timelines
- Lower per-image cost for high-volume needs like multi-room properties, A/B testing thumbnails, or generating many staging options
- Image-to-image support for iterative staging workflows—starting from an existing room photo or prior render and refining the look
- LoRA support for style consistency (e.g., repeating a brand look across listings or matching a specific interior design aesthetic)
- Practical choice for drafting concepts and moodboard-style explorations before committing to premium final outputs
Verdict
If you need listing-hero photorealism—especially for luxury interiors, close-ups, and polished marketing images—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the better fit, with detail and realism that can justify the higher credit cost.
If your priority is speed, iteration, and cost control—or you rely on image-to-image and LoRA to keep a consistent staging style across many rooms—Z-Image Turbo is the more efficient workhorse for real estate production workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for real estate & interiors.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand