Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
3D renders, CGI scenes, and digital art — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux Ultra 1.1 and Z-Image Turbo are two Influencer Studio image models that can both produce compelling 3D graphics—from polished CGI product shots to stylized digital art environments. The key difference is the trade-off between premium photoreal detail and fast, cost-efficient iteration.
If your priority is cinematic realism, crisp materials, and high-end render fidelity, Flux Ultra 1.1 is positioned as the premium choice. If you need rapid concepting, flexible style tuning (including LoRA support), or higher volume output for 3D scene exploration, Z-Image Turbo is built for speed and affordability.
3D Graphics — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Photorealistic 3D render (Blender/Unreal Engine look) of a 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black bike shorts, holding a smartphone at arm’s length for a casual front-camera selfie and glancing slightly off-lens mid-sentence. She’s sitting by a window in a cozy neighborhood café with a half-finished iced latte, tote bag on the chair, and soft morning sun casting natural window light with subtle volumetric rays, subsurface scattering on skin, and realistic fabric/wood/metal PBR materials. Candid Instagram-story vibe, slightly imperfect framing, shallow depth of field, authentic clutter and reflections (cup condensation, phone screen glow)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for 3D renders (surface texture, edge sharpness, fine geometry cues)
- Photorealistic CGI look that suits product-style renders, architectural visuals, and cinematic frames
- Premium-quality lighting and material feel for metals, glass, plastics, and skin-like shaders
- Strong final-pass output when you need fewer iterations and a more “finished render” aesthetic
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid 3D concept exploration and scene variations
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume ideation, mood boards, and batch testing
- LoRA support for style/character pipelines and consistent 3D art direction across a series
- Image-to-image capability for refining existing CGI drafts, blocking, or composition studies
Verdict
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 when your 3D graphics need to look premium and photoreal—ideal for hero images, high-detail CGI scenes, and final marketing-ready renders where material realism and polish matter most.
Choose Z-Image Turbo when speed, iteration, and controllable styling are the priority—great for generating lots of 3D scene options quickly, applying LoRAs for consistent art direction, or using image-to-image to evolve a draft into multiple variations at half the per-image cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for 3d graphics.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand