Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
Skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Beauty content lives or dies on realism: clean skin texture, accurate undertones, believable lighting, and makeup placement that looks intentional—not painted on. Influencer Studio offers two strong options for skincare and makeup creatives: Flux Ultra 1.1 for premium photoreal detail, and Z-Image Turbo for fast, cost-effective generation with flexible styling.
This comparison focuses on the needs of beauty creators—editorial makeup looks, skincare “glass skin” shots, product-centric closeups, and consistent brand aesthetics—so you can choose the right model for your workflow and budget.
Beauty & Makeup — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Young woman (early 20s), shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a claw clip, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and small gold hoops, filming a front-facing phone selfie in her messy bedroom vanity while applying cream blush with her fingers and glancing toward the camera mid-blend. Soft ring-light glow mixed with window daylight, dewy skin close-up, natural freckles visible, with skincare and makeup products (tinted moisturizer, lip oil, blush compact) casually arranged on the vanity alongside a half-full iced coffee. Candid “GRWM” vibe, slightly imperfect background (laundry basket, open drawer), approachable and unpolished like an Instagram story."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for close-up beauty shots (skin texture, pores, highlight sheen, and natural shadow falloff)
- High fidelity makeup details (sharp liner edges, realistic lash separation, lip texture, and blush placement)
- Premium “campaign-ready” polish for hero images and product + face compositions
- Better results when you need nuanced lighting and accurate undertones across different skin tones
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid concepting of makeup looks and skincare scenes
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume testing, moodboards, and content batches
- LoRA support for consistent style direction (brand look, seasonal makeup trends, or creator-specific aesthetics)
- Image-to-image capability for refining an existing beauty shot, pose, or composition while changing makeup/styling
Verdict
If your priority is premium, photoreal beauty imagery—especially tight crops where skin and makeup realism must hold up—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger choice, albeit at a higher cost (16 credits per image). It’s best for hero visuals, skincare closeups, and “finished” campaign-style outputs.
If you need speed, iteration, and style consistency at scale—particularly for testing multiple makeup variations or maintaining a brand look via LoRAs—Z-Image Turbo is the practical pick (8 credits per image). Many beauty teams use it for exploration and batch creation, then reserve Flux Ultra 1.1 for final selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for beauty & makeup.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand