Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Z-Image Turbo
Corporate and professional headshot photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux Ultra 1.1 and Z-Image Turbo both generate professional headshots on Influencer Studio, but they’re optimized for different priorities. Flux Ultra 1.1 targets premium, photorealistic results with ultra-high detail—useful when your headshot needs to hold up to close inspection for corporate profiles, press kits, and executive bios.
Z-Image Turbo focuses on speed and efficiency, adding flexibility with image-to-image and LoRA support. It’s a strong fit for teams that need many headshot variations quickly (different outfits, backgrounds, crops, or brand looks) while keeping credits per image lower.
Professional Headshot — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid selfie-style professional headshot of a 25–32-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing a smart-casual blazer over a plain white tee, looking slightly past the phone camera with a relaxed confident half-smile. Shot against a clean light-grey wall in a quiet corner of a café (no visible logos), seated upright with one hand holding the phone and the other resting on the table, natural window light softly lighting her face. Realistic smartphone photo feel, subtle background blur, authentic “LinkedIn headshot meets Instagram story” vibe (not editorial)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Premium photorealism with high micro-detail (skin texture, hair strands, fabric weave) suited to executive-grade headshots
- Strong clarity for tight crops and high-resolution usage (LinkedIn, company sites, speaker pages) without looking “generated” at a glance
- More reliable studio-style lighting and polished finish for corporate aesthetics (clean key light, natural contrast, crisp edges)
- Best choice when you need fewer images, but each one must look high-end and publication-ready
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Faster turnaround for rapid iteration (pose, framing, background, wardrobe) when generating many corporate headshot options
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for budget-conscious teams or high-volume headshot batches
- Image-to-image makes it easier to preserve an existing headshot’s composition while refining style, background, or lighting
- LoRA support enables consistent brand styling (e.g., a specific corporate backdrop look or a repeatable portrait aesthetic)
Verdict
If your priority is premium realism and fine detail for executive or client-facing corporate headshots, Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the better pick—especially when quality matters more than quantity and you can spend 16 credits per image.
If you need headshot variations at scale, want faster generation, or plan to standardize a branded portrait look via LoRA and image-to-image workflows, Z-Image Turbo is the more efficient choice at 8 credits per image.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for professional headshot.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand