Flux 2 vs Grok Imagine
Film grain, retro aesthetic, and nostalgic filters — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Vintage & retro visuals live or die on the details: believable film grain, era-accurate color shifts, gentle halation, and that imperfect “printed photo” feel. On Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Grok Imagine both deliver nostalgic aesthetics, but they approach the look differently—one leaning into controllable styling and edits, the other into fast, creative generation.
This comparison focuses on how each model handles film grain, retro palettes, and nostalgic filters for creator workflows—whether you’re producing 70s street photography, 90s flash snapshots, faded postcards, or cinematic vintage portraits.
Vintage & Retro — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid 90s disposable-camera style selfie of a 20s woman with shoulder-length dark brown hair and wispy bangs, wearing a slightly oversized vintage band tee and high-waisted light-wash jeans, holding an iced coffee and looking just past the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile. Shot in a cozy neighborhood café by a window with natural morning light, cluttered table (lip balm, keys, paperback), subtle film grain, faded colors, warm nostalgic tone, and a faint light leak at the edge."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 4 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Strong control over retro styling via LoRA support—use consistent film-era looks across a full campaign
- Versatile image-to-image editing for “modern-to-vintage” transformations (add grain, soften contrast, shift tones) while keeping composition stable
- Up to 4MP output helps preserve fine grain structure and texture (paper, fabric, dust/scratches) without turning muddy
- Style transfer is well-suited for applying a unified nostalgic filter to multiple assets
- Face-swap support can maintain identity consistency when recreating vintage portraits or “then vs now” concepts
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Very cost-efficient per image, making it ideal for rapid retro concepting and mood-board exploration
- Strong creative compositions that suit nostalgic storytelling (postcards, album covers, diner scenes, street moments)
- High-detail output that can render convincing retro props and environments (signage, film cameras, period clothing)
- Solid text-to-image performance for quick “era prompts” (e.g., 70s, 80s, 90s) with minimal setup
Verdict
If your priority is consistent vintage styling—matching grain, color science, and era cues across many images—Flux 2 is typically the better fit thanks to LoRA support, higher-resolution output, and flexible editing tools. It’s especially useful when you need to apply a repeatable nostalgic filter, refine an existing photo into a retro look, or keep a creator’s identity consistent across variations.
If you want fast, affordable retro experimentation with strong creative range, Grok Imagine is the value pick. At a much lower per-image cost, it’s well-suited for generating lots of vintage concepts quickly—then selecting the best directions to polish further.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for vintage & retro.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand