Flux 2 vs Grok Imagine
Top-down arranged compositions and aesthetic product flat lays — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flat lay visuals live or die by composition: clean top-down geometry, consistent lighting, believable shadows, and crisp material detail. In Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Grok Imagine both generate strong flat lays, but they shine in different parts of the workflow—especially when you need repeatable layouts for product grids, seasonal drops, or branded content series.
Below is a focused comparison for flat lay creation: how each model handles arranged objects, typography-like spacing, surfaces (linen, marble, wood), and post-generation adjustments such as moving items, matching a brand style, or iterating on the same scene across multiple SKUs.
Flat Lay — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Top-down overhead flat lay on a cozy bedroom duvet: a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair leans into the frame from the top edge, looking up toward the phone camera with a relaxed, candid expression, one hand holding an iced coffee near her face. Neatly arranged around her are a skincare serum, lip balm, claw clip, earbuds, a paperback book, and a slightly open tote bag, plus a wrinkled “to-do” notepad and a half-eaten croissant for an everyday, lived-in vibe. Soft natural window light, casual hoodie and bike shorts, subtle imperfections (crumbs, fingerprints on the cup) to feel like an authentic Instagram story flat lay."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 4 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Best for iterative flat lay workflows thanks to versatile image-to-image editing (refine placement, spacing, and background without restarting)
- LoRA support helps lock in a consistent brand look across multiple top-down sets (color palette, props, surface textures, lighting feel)
- Up to 4MP output is well-suited for sharp product detail in flat lays (labels, stitching, small accessories) and for cropping into multiple formats
- Strong style transfer for turning a single reference flat lay into a repeatable template across variations
- Face-swap support can help when flat lays include hands/arms or lifestyle elements entering the frame (when applicable)
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Excellent at generating photorealistic flat lays quickly, with strong material realism (glass, metal, fabric weave) and natural shadows
- Creative compositions are a plus for editorial flat lays (dynamic prop mixes, seasonal storytelling, unexpected arrangements)
- High detail output produces convincing textures and micro-contrast that make top-down scenes feel less “rendered”
- Very cost-efficient per image, enabling rapid exploration of multiple layout concepts and prop combinations
Verdict
If your flat lay work requires repeatability and control—like maintaining the same top-down layout across a product line, enforcing strict brand styling, or fine-tuning object placement—Flux 2 is typically the better fit due to its editing versatility, LoRA support, and higher-resolution output.
If you prioritize fast, photorealistic flat lay ideation and want to generate many options at low cost—especially for mood boards, campaign exploration, or creative prop storytelling—Grok Imagine is a strong choice, with a major advantage in per-image pricing.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for flat lay.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand