Flux 2 vs Grok Imagine
Skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Beauty content lives or dies on skin texture, accurate tones, and believable makeup placement. In Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Grok Imagine both support text-to-image and image-to-image workflows, but they differ in how they handle editing control, stylization, and cost per render for skincare and makeup creatives.
This comparison focuses on common beauty use cases—clean skincare ads, glam makeup looks, before/after concepts, and creator-style portraits—so you can pick the model that best fits your workflow, brand consistency needs, and budget.
Beauty & Makeup — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Candid phone-camera selfie of a 20s beauty influencer with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair in a loose beige hoodie, sitting at a small bedroom vanity and looking near the camera while tapping concealer under one eye with a damp sponge. Soft ring-light glow mixed with morning window light, dewy flawless skin and natural brows, with an open makeup bag and a few cleanly arranged products (tinted moisturizer, blush stick, lip oil) scattered on the desk like a real GRWM moment. Slightly messy background (unmade bed, skincare bottles on a shelf), casual and approachable TikTok-style framing."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 4 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Best for consistent beauty branding via LoRA support (e.g., repeatable “signature glam” or campaign-specific makeup aesthetics)
- Strong image-to-image editing for refining makeup placement, adjusting lip/eye looks, and iterating on an existing portrait
- Up to 4MP output helps preserve fine details like lash separation, brow hairs, and subtle skin texture for close-up crops
- Versatile style transfer for shifting between editorial, clean-girl, K-beauty, and high-fashion lighting without restarting from scratch
- Face-swap support can speed up creator variations (multiple “talent” options) while keeping the same makeup concept
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Excellent photorealistic beauty renders for skincare and makeup hero images with strong overall detail
- Fast, creative text-to-image ideation for new looks (color stories, bold liner concepts, seasonal trends)
- Cost-efficient at 4 credits per image—useful for high-volume testing of prompts, shades, and compositions
- Strong at polished, high-impact compositions (campaign-style frames, product-in-hand, vanity setups)
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your beauty workflow depends on controlled editing, repeatable brand style (LoRA), and high-resolution close-ups where makeup precision and skin detail matter—especially when you’re iterating on a base image.
Choose Grok Imagine if you want photorealistic beauty images at scale and need to explore many skincare/makeup concepts quickly and cheaply. For teams doing lots of prompt exploration and A/B testing, its low per-image cost is a major advantage.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for beauty & makeup.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand