Flux 2 vs Grok Imagine
Buildings, facades, and architectural visualization — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Grok Imagine are both strong options in Influencer Studio for Architecture & Exterior work—think building facades, streetscapes, real-estate visuals, and architectural concept renders. They overlap on core generation (text-to-image and image-to-image), but differ sharply in editing depth, maximum output resolution, and cost per render.
If your workflow involves iterating on a base elevation, applying consistent materials across multiple views, or making targeted facade changes, Flux 2’s toolset is built for that. If you’re prioritizing fast, affordable ideation with high-detail, photoreal-leaning outputs, Grok Imagine offers strong value per image.
Architecture & Exterior — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Casual phone-camera wide selfie of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a light hoodie, straight-leg jeans, and sneakers, standing on a city sidewalk at golden hour and glancing toward the lens mid-sentence like she’s filming an Instagram Story. Behind her is a striking modern glass-and-concrete building shot from a dramatic low angle with strong leading lines and reflections, warm sun flaring off the facade while street life feels real (a bike rack, a café patio, a few pedestrians). Natural lighting, candid handheld framing, slightly imperfect composition like a TikTok thumbnail."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 4 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Higher-resolution output (up to 4MP) for crisp facade details, signage, fenestration, and material textures
- Versatile image-to-image editing for architectural iterations (massings, window rhythm, cladding swaps, streetscape adjustments)
- LoRA support for consistent architectural styles (e.g., brutalist concrete, Mediterranean stucco, Art Deco detailing) across a series
- Style transfer to explore multiple visualization looks (concept sketch, clay render, brochure-ready realism) from the same exterior
- Face-swap support when exteriors include lifestyle/people elements in real-estate marketing scenes
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong creative composition for exterior scenes (hero angles, dramatic lighting, contextual landscaping and surroundings)
- High-detail, photorealistic quality suited to marketing-style architectural visuals and streetscape imagery
- Simple, fast text-to-image workflow for early-stage exterior ideation and mood exploration
- Very low per-image cost (4 credits) for high-volume exploration of facade concepts and variations
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 when architectural visualization is iterative and precision-driven: refining elevations, maintaining consistency across multiple exterior views, or producing sharper deliverables where 4MP resolution and advanced editing matter. It’s also a strong fit when you need repeatable style control via LoRA for a cohesive project set.
Choose Grok Imagine when you want cost-effective, high-volume exterior ideation with compelling, photoreal-leaning results. At 4 credits per image, it’s the better value for rapid exploration of building concepts, facade moods, and environment variations—especially before you commit to detailed editing workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for architecture & exterior.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand