Flux 2 vs Grok Imagine
Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Cyberpunk and sci-fi visuals live or die on atmosphere: neon haze, rain-slick streets, holographic signage, dense skyline layering, and believable futuristic tech. On Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Grok Imagine both target high-impact image generation, but they approach the genre from different strengths—control and customization vs. fast, cost-efficient creativity.
Below is a focused comparison for neon cityscapes, dystopian aesthetics, and futuristic tech concepts, including how each model handles detail, consistency, editing workflows, and cost per image.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera selfie of a 20s influencer with short black bob hair and subtle neon eyeliner, wearing an oversized hoodie, cargo pants, and chunky sneakers, looking slightly past the lens while holding a takeaway ramen cup mid-bite. Set on a rain-slick neon street corner under a glowing awning with pink-blue-purple holographic ads and a distant skyline of cyberpunk high-rises, wet pavement reflections everywhere. Natural streetlight + sign glow, slightly grainy handheld framing like an Instagram story screenshot, not posed or polished."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 4 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Stronger control for cyberpunk art direction via LoRA support (useful for consistent factions, uniforms, signage styles, or recurring character looks)
- Versatile image editing workflows (image-to-image, style transfer, and face-swap) for iterating on neon palettes, rainy atmospherics, and techwear details without restarting from scratch
- Up to 4MP output for sharper cityscape micro-details like kanji-style signage, cable clutter, HUD overlays, and reflective surfaces
- Good fit for building a cohesive dystopian “series” (same protagonist, same megacorp branding, consistent vehicle silhouettes) across many posts
Grok Imagine Strengths
- High creative output for bold cyberpunk compositions (dynamic angles, cinematic framing, and striking color contrast)
- Strong photorealistic quality for believable futuristic tech props, armor plating, and materials (glass, chrome, wet asphalt, LED diffusion)
- Fast, cost-efficient exploration at 4 credits per image—ideal for generating many neon-city variations and picking the strongest concepts
- Reliable high-detail renders for single-shot hero images where you want impact without extensive tuning or customization
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 when you need control and repeatability for cyberpunk worlds—especially if you’re building a consistent dystopian brand identity, recurring characters, or a signature neon-sign language. Its editing toolkit and LoRA support make it better for structured iteration and long-running series content, with the added benefit of up to 4MP output.
Choose Grok Imagine when you want strong-looking cyberpunk and sci-fi images quickly and cheaply. At 4 credits per image, it’s the better option for rapid ideation—testing many neon cityscapes, tech concepts, and cinematic frames—then refining your best picks.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand