Flux 2 vs Grok Imagine
Polished ad creative for social platforms — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for social media ads comes down to two things: how quickly you can produce scroll-stopping creatives, and how reliably you can keep them on-brand across variations (formats, hooks, offers, and audiences). Flux 2 and Grok Imagine both generate high-quality images for paid and organic campaigns, but they excel in different parts of the ad workflow.
Below is a practical comparison focused on polished ad production for platforms like Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Pinterest, and LinkedIn—covering creative range, photorealism, iteration speed, editing flexibility, and how far your credits go when you’re generating multiple variants.
Social Media Ad — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a cozy oversized cream sweater and light-wash jeans sits by a sunny café window, holding an iced latte in one hand and a sleek reusable water bottle with a visible logo in the other, glancing near the phone camera mid-laugh like a candid TikTok thumbnail. Shot on a front-facing smartphone camera with bright natural window light, small table with a croissant and keys, slightly messy tote bag on the chair, clean aspirational “morning routine” ad vibe with polished but relatable product placement."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 4 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Brand consistency at scale via LoRA support (useful for recurring product lines, signature looks, or creator-style ad sets)
- Versatile image editing (image-to-image, style transfer, and face-swap support) for fast revisions without restarting from scratch
- Up to 4MP output for crisp crops across placements (feed, stories, reels covers, and carousel panels)
- Strong for structured ad pipelines where you need many controlled variations (background swaps, seasonal themes, localized assets)
- Two pricing tiers (Standard and Klein 9B) that let teams choose higher fidelity vs. lower cost per image
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Excellent creative output for attention-grabbing concepts and fresh visual directions (useful for rapid ad ideation)
- Strong photorealistic quality and high detail for lifestyle ads, product-in-scene shots, and hero images
- Low per-image cost (4 credits) makes high-volume testing affordable (many hooks, angles, and audiences)
- Good for quick text-to-image generation when you want multiple distinct concepts fast
- Efficient for broad exploration before narrowing down to a final art direction
Verdict
Pick Flux 2 when your social ad workflow depends on repeatable brand consistency, controlled edits, and higher-resolution outputs—especially if you’re producing a cohesive campaign with many variations (same product, different backgrounds, offers, or creator likeness).
Pick Grok Imagine when you want fast, cost-effective creative exploration and photorealistic concepts at scale. Its low credit cost is ideal for performance marketers running lots of iterations, then selecting winners to refine into production-ready ads.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for social media ad.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand