Flux 2 vs Grok Imagine
Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Grok Imagine are two strong options in Influencer Studio for creating photorealistic images that can pass as real photos. While both can produce high-detail results, they differ in how reliably they hold realism across faces, textures, lighting, and camera-like artifacts—and in how much control you get after generation.
This comparison focuses specifically on hyperrealistic output: believable skin and hair, natural depth of field, accurate materials (fabric, metal, glass), and “shot on a camera” lighting. It also weighs practical workflow factors like image-to-image editing, face swapping, LoRA support for consistent identities, output resolution, and credits per render.
Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Hyperrealistic photorealistic DSLR-quality image of a woman in her mid-20s with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair and light freckles, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black biker shorts, holding her phone slightly above eye level for a casual front-camera selfie while glancing toward the lens with a relaxed half-smile. She’s standing in a small sunlit kitchen next to a cluttered countertop (coffee mug, bananas, mail), mid-pour of oat milk into iced coffee, with natural morning window light and realistic skin texture and minor imperfections. Authentic UGC vibe like an Instagram story—slight motion blur in her pouring hand, unposed posture, true-to-life color and lighting physics."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Grok Imagine |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | xAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 4 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- High-resolution output up to 4MP for crisp, photo-like detail and cleaner crops
- Versatile image editing (image-to-image, style transfer) for refining realism without restarting from scratch
- LoRA support to lock in consistent subjects, faces, wardrobes, and product looks across a series
- Face-swap support for photoreal identity continuity in influencer-style campaigns
- Good fit for controlled studio/product realism where repeatability matters
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Very low cost per image (4 credits) for high-volume photoreal experimentation and iteration
- Strong creative compositions that can still maintain a realistic, photographic feel
- High-detail outputs that work well for lifestyle scenes and varied environments
- Efficient for rapid prompt testing to find the most believable lighting and framing
Verdict
Flux 2 is typically the better choice when photorealism needs to be repeatable and art-directable—especially for consistent identities, brand/product continuity, and iterative edits using image-to-image workflows. Its 4MP output and LoRA/face-swap options make it well-suited to campaigns where “same person, same vibe, different shots” matters.
Grok Imagine stands out on value and speed-to-iteration: at 4 credits per image, it’s ideal for generating many photoreal options quickly and exploring compositions. If your priority is producing lots of realistic candidates fast (and selecting the best), it’s a practical pick—while Flux 2 is the stronger tool when you need tighter control and consistency.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Grok Imagine, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand