Flux 2 vs Flux Ultra 1.1
Eye-catching and expressive thumbnail imagery — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for YouTube thumbnails comes down to two things: stopping power (bold, readable visuals at a glance) and control (fast iteration on faces, style, and layout). Flux 2 and Flux Ultra 1.1 both generate high-impact images, but they shine in different parts of the thumbnail workflow.
Flux 2 is built for versatility—editing, style transfer, face-swap support, and LoRA fine-tuning for repeatable channel branding—while Flux Ultra 1.1 prioritizes premium photoreal detail for thumbnails that feel cinematic and high-end.
YouTube Thumbnail — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Close-up phone-camera shot of a 20s influencer with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a cozy oversized hoodie and simple gold hoops, holding an iced coffee up near their face with a wide-eyed “WAIT—WHAT?!” surprised expression, looking straight at/just above the lens. Candid café setting with a messy table (laptop, pastry bag, keys) and bright window daylight hitting one side of the face, bold colorful signage blurred in the background, high-contrast clickbait YouTube thumbnail vibe with dynamic off-center framing. Natural lighting, casual and approachable like an Instagram story screenshot."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Flux Ultra 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 16 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Best for iterative thumbnail workflows: image-to-image editing makes it easier to refine poses, expressions, and composition without restarting
- LoRA support for consistent channel branding (recurring characters, signature looks, or repeatable thumbnail style)
- Up to 4MP output helps preserve sharpness for crops, zoom-ins, and text overlays
- Style transfer enables quick testing of bold, high-contrast looks that read well at small sizes
- Face-swap support for creator-centric thumbnails where recognizable identity matters
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for attention-grabbing, high-trust thumbnails (especially people, products, and real-world scenes)
- Ultra-high detail that holds up well when you crop tight on faces or key objects
- Premium-quality rendering that can reduce the need for heavy post-processing to look “finished”
- Strong choice for cinematic lighting and lifelike textures that boost perceived production value
Verdict
Pick Flux 2 if your thumbnail process depends on control and repeatability—editing an existing image, maintaining a consistent brand style via LoRA, or producing creator-focused thumbnails with face-swap support. It’s the more flexible option for teams that iterate heavily.
Pick Flux Ultra 1.1 if you mainly need premium, photoreal thumbnails with standout detail at a lower per-image credit cost. For realism-first channels (news, documentary, tech, product, lifestyle), it’s often the fastest route to a polished, high-end look.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Flux Ultra 1.1, and all our other AI models for youtube thumbnail.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand