Flux 2 vs Flux Ultra 1.1
Top-down arranged compositions and aesthetic product flat lays — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flat lays live or die by top-down composition, clean geometry, believable materials, and styling consistency across a set. Influencer Studio’s Flux 2 and Flux Ultra 1.1 both handle flat lay generation well, but they optimize for different priorities: control and iteration vs premium realism and micro-detail.
Below is a focused comparison for aesthetic flat lays—product spreads, outfit grids, desk setups, skincare arrangements, food plating, and seasonal mood boards—covering composition reliability, texture fidelity, editability, and cost per usable frame.
Flat Lay — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Top-down flat lay overhead shot on a slightly messy café table: a young woman (early 20s–30s) with wavy dark-brown hair and a casual oatmeal sweater leans into the frame from the top edge, looking near the phone camera while holding an iced latte mid-sip. Aesthetic arrangement of her phone (Instagram story screen visible), croissant on a plate, sunglasses, lip balm, earbuds, and a small notebook with a pen, all balanced on a clean marble surface with a few natural crumbs for realism. Soft window daylight, subtle shadows, candid everyday vibe like a real UGC post."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Flux Ultra 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 16 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Stronger iterative workflow for flat lays thanks to image-to-image editing (easy repositioning, background swaps, and layout refinements without restarting)
- LoRA support for consistent flat lay styling across a campaign (repeatable props, color palettes, lighting moods, and brand look)
- Versatile creative control: style transfer plus targeted edits help maintain a coherent top-down grid and spacing
- Up to 4MP output supports crisp product labels, fabric weave, and sharp edges in neatly arranged compositions
- Face-swap support can help when flat lays include hands, reflections, or lifestyle elements that need continuity
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for flat lays—more convincing materials (glass, metal, plastic), shadows, and surface interactions
- Ultra-high detail helps with premium product scenes (cosmetics, jewelry, tech accessories) where micro-texture sells authenticity
- Often produces more “camera-like” top-down lighting falloff and natural specular highlights, reducing the need for post-processing
- Good choice when you want a final hero flat lay quickly, with minimal editing passes
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your flat lay workflow involves iteration, brand consistency, or controlled variations (same layout with different colorways, seasonal props, or product rotations). Its editing tools and LoRA support make it easier to lock a top-down composition and keep it consistent across multiple deliverables.
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 if you want the most photorealistic, premium-looking flat lay in fewer attempts—especially for close-up product spreads where believable textures and lighting realism are the main goal. At 16 credits per image, it can also be the better value when you’re primarily generating final frames rather than heavily editing.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Flux Ultra 1.1, and all our other AI models for flat lay.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand