Flux 2 vs Flux Ultra 1.1
Polished ad creative for social platforms — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Flux Ultra 1.1 are two strong options in Influencer Studio for producing polished social media ad creative. Both can generate high-impact visuals from prompts, but they differ in how much control you get during iteration—and how consistently they deliver premium-looking results.
This comparison focuses on paid-social needs: scroll-stopping imagery, brand consistency across variants, fast iteration for A/B tests, and outputs that hold up to platform crops and overlays.
Social Media Ad — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a cozy oversized cream sweater and light-wash jeans holds a sleek stainless insulated water bottle with a visible logo, looking just off the front-facing phone camera with a relaxed half-smile. Candid café moment at a window seat with an iced latte and laptop in the background, one hand on the bottle like she’s mid-sip while talking to her followers. Bright natural window light, clean modern coffee shop setting, casual Instagram Story/TikTok UGC ad vibe with polished product placement."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Flux Ultra 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 16 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- More creative control for ad iteration: image-to-image editing enables fast refinements (background swaps, product repositioning, layout tweaks) without restarting from scratch
- Brand-consistent campaigns with LoRA support, making it easier to keep a recognizable look across multiple ad variants and seasonal refreshes
- Versatile ad production toolkit: style transfer and face-swap support can help localize or personalize creatives while maintaining a consistent concept
- Up to 4MP output supports crisp crops for multiple placements (feed, story, square) and preserves detail under text/CTA overlays
- Flexible cost options (Standard vs Klein 9B) let teams choose higher capability or lower credits depending on the creative task
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional detail and photorealism for premium-looking ads that feel high-production and ready for direct-to-platform publishing
- Strong choice for hero creatives (single-image ads) where realism, texture, and lighting are critical to perceived product value
- Simple workflow: optimized for text-to-image generation when you want high quality without extra setup or customization steps
- Predictable per-image pricing (16 credits) makes budgeting straightforward for ongoing ad production
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your social ad workflow depends on iteration and control—editing existing images, maintaining brand style across a campaign, or generating many variations for A/B testing. Its LoRA support and editing features are especially useful when you need consistency across multiple creatives and placements.
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 if your priority is premium, photorealistic output with minimal effort—ideal for hero images, product-forward ads, and situations where the first generation needs to look exceptionally polished. With a lower per-image cost than Flux 2 Standard and the same per-image cost as Flux 2 Klein 9B, it can be a strong default for high-end ad visuals.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Flux Ultra 1.1, and all our other AI models for social media ad.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand