Flux 2 vs Flux Ultra 1.1
Attractive and approachable dating app photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Dating profile photos need a specific balance: flattering but believable, stylish but approachable, and consistent across multiple looks. On Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Flux Ultra 1.1 both aim to produce high-quality dating app photography, but they excel in different parts of the workflow.
Below is a practical comparison focused on photorealism, face consistency, editability, and cost per image—so you can choose the best model for first-photo “hook” shots, lifestyle candids, and cohesive multi-photo sets.
Dating Profile Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid dating-profile-style photo of a 25–32-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing a cozy cream knit sweater and high-waisted jeans, holding her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie while looking near the camera with a warm, genuine smile. She’s outside at a neighborhood café patio with a latte on the table and a few plants in the background, golden-hour natural light softly flattering her face, slight background blur like a real Instagram story frame. Keep it authentic and unposed—tiny imperfections, natural skin texture, relaxed posture, not editorial or cinematic."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Flux Ultra 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 16 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Best for iterating and refining: strong image-to-image editing for adjusting outfit, background, lighting, and overall vibe without restarting
- LoRA support for consistent “you” across a full dating set (same face identity, style, and aesthetic over multiple images)
- Face-swap support for maintaining identity when testing different scenes (coffee shop, rooftop, park walk) while keeping the subject recognizable
- Up to 4MP output helps preserve sharp facial features and clean details that read well on dating apps
- Flexible style transfer for dialing in approachable looks (natural daylight, soft editorial, casual candid) without overglamour
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional detail and photorealistic rendering for standout primary profile photos (skin texture, hair detail, natural depth)
- Premium-quality outputs that often look “camera-shot” with less prompt tweaking for realistic dating-app aesthetics
- Great for clean, flattering lighting and crisp compositions that feel professional without heavy stylization
- Strong choice when you want a high-impact hero image quickly (less emphasis on editing pipelines, more on final polish)
- Cost-efficient at 16 credits per image for premium photorealistic generations
Verdict
If your goal is a single, ultra-polished hero image that looks convincingly real and high-end, Flux Ultra 1.1 is the most direct route—especially for your first photo where realism and detail matter most.
If you’re building a cohesive dating profile set (3–6 photos) and expect to iterate—keeping the same face while changing outfits, locations, and lighting—Flux 2 is typically the better workflow model thanks to editing tools, face-swap support, and LoRA fine-tuning. Value-wise, Flux Ultra 1.1 is cheaper per image than Flux 2 Standard, while Flux 2’s Klein 9B tier matches Flux Ultra 1.1’s 16-credit price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Flux Ultra 1.1, and all our other AI models for dating profile photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand