Flux 2 vs Flux Ultra 1.1
Advertising campaigns and lifestyle branding — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for a Brand Campaign often comes down to two priorities: how fast you can iterate on creative concepts and how consistently you can deliver polished, on-brand visuals for ads, social, and landing pages. Flux 2 and Flux Ultra 1.1 both support text-to-image generation, but they’re optimized for different stages of an advertising workflow.
Flux 2 leans into versatility—editing, style transfer, and customization—while Flux Ultra 1.1 is built for premium-looking output with exceptional detail and photorealism. Below is a brand-campaign-focused comparison to help you pick the best fit for lifestyle branding and advertising production.
Brand Campaign — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, minimal makeup, wearing a cream oversized hoodie and black bike shorts, holds an iced coffee and glances toward the phone camera mid-laugh while walking past a sunlit neighborhood café patio. Shot like an Instagram Story with a handheld phone at arm’s length, natural window light and soft shadows, but with clean commercial-grade clarity and subtle brand-consistent color grading (warm neutrals, crisp skin tones) as the branded reusable cup is clearly visible in her hand. Authentic everyday vibe—slightly messy hair, candid motion blur in the background, real street details (menu board, bikes, passing pedestrians)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Flux Ultra 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 16 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Versatile campaign workflows: text-to-image plus image-to-image editing for rapid ad iteration and versioning
- LoRA support for brand consistency (e.g., recurring product looks, signature lighting, or campaign-specific style systems)
- Up to 4MP output for sharper creatives suitable for many paid social and web placements
- Style transfer tools to explore multiple lifestyle directions (editorial, minimal, vibrant, seasonal) without restarting from scratch
- Face-swap support for controlled talent variations and localized campaign versions (where appropriate and compliant)
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Premium, photorealistic look that elevates lifestyle ads and hero visuals
- Exceptional detail for products, textures, and materials—useful for close-ups and high-impact creative
- Strong choice when the priority is “final-ready” imagery with minimal post-processing
- Simple pricing at 16 credits per image for predictable budgeting on premium outputs
Verdict
If your brand campaign needs maximum control and repeatability—especially editing existing shots, applying style transfer, or building a consistent campaign look with LoRA—Flux 2 is the more flexible production tool. It’s well-suited to teams producing many variations (different headlines, backgrounds, seasonal palettes, or localized versions) while keeping a cohesive identity.
If your priority is premium photorealism and standout detail for hero creatives, lifestyle scenes, and high-end advertising aesthetics, Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger pick—and it does so at a straightforward 16 credits per image. Many teams use Flux Ultra 1.1 for “final selects” and Flux 2 for iterative exploration and editing.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Flux Ultra 1.1, and all our other AI models for brand campaign.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand